-
Posts
494 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Developer Articles
KSP2 Release Notes
Everything posted by Flush Foot
-
What happened to increased communication?
Flush Foot replied to DoomsdayDuck555's topic in KSP2 Discussion
-
@Dakota sent out a tweet ("maybe not working at IG anymore"), and there is a screengrab from a Discord server where @blackrack said that he's looking for new job opportunities.
- 904 replies
-
- 1
-
- ill-advised
- sos
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
I was a fairly long ways into playing KSP 1 before I ever bothered with mods, and 'fearing performance hits' I probably steered even further from the 'make it pretty' mods, but with a much more modern, beefy rig now, I've dabbled with EVE/Scatterer 'installs', and now with this latest news, I've gone and subscribed to @blackrack's Patreon to 'do what I can'.
-
How can TakeTwo justify layoffs with this revenue ?
Flush Foot replied to DanW's topic in KSP2 Discussion
Much as it saddens me, don't they have revenues like that because they don't "back the wrong horses" and/or "cut their losses"? <note: I did not click the link / check the numbers> -
I did not see anything in that Bloomberg article that we all had not read / learned on our own... Sure, they've probably stated the "most likely scenario", but there were no new facts / official statements (in the article) that would suggest they 'know more' than us.
-
@Stevie_D given the 'AAA-level' backing the game seemed to have, I was less concerned about 'will we get it all' of it all, especially with the EA trailer's "[these features] will be added to the game during Early Access".
-
Also false... I couldn't give two* flying effs about Multiplayer. "Mission Complete / Feature Complete" for me would have been Colonies with Resources, with Interstellar a 'nice to have'.
-
Weekly Challenge #54: Miniature Mission
Flush Foot replied to Dakota's topic in Challenges & Mission Ideas
-
We still have not been told, explicitly/officially, that IG is the studio in Seattle that is being closed, hence my comment: If we do indeed assume on our own that IG is the studio that's gone (which is likely, but unconfirmed), then your comment(s) are perfectly logical. [why hire into a defunct studio?]
-
This post?