-
Posts
4,585 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Developer Articles
KSP2 Release Notes
Everything posted by GoldForest
-
One of three ways: 1) You can stick a rover on the Truck, as intended, then dock the CSM to the rover. 2) Totally unmanned Truck. It wouldn't stay inside the S-IVB stage, it would detach and fly on its own. 3) The CSM and Truck would travel separately to the Moon (Mun in our case) via same launch or separate launches. They would then rendezvous in orbit of the Moon/Mun. IRL, the Apollo crew would then remote guide the truck down to landing via orbital radio control. The truck would then wait for the NEXT lunar landing crew, as the crew in the rendezvous CSM that piloted it down would have gone home after probably sometime in lunar orbit without having landed on the Moon themselves. In KSP, you could EVA over to the truck and let a Kerbal pilot it down to the surface. Just make sure you have a base established with a way for them to get back home first. Edit: The LM Truck has more than enough Delta V to make it to circularize around the Mun, I did so at about 16KM, and then head on down to the surface. 274 M/S left in the tanks. KSP says that's about 47 seconds of fuel. Mechjeb concurs with that estimate at around 46.7 seconds.
-
I was using Centaur I, so maybe it was a little heavy. I didn't realize the stage was that small. Then again, I was probably assuming that J-1A/U used the same upper stage as Galazy Express, which is basically a methalox Centaur from the looks of it. Also, that looks like an Agena engine bell in the diagram.
-
You should ping @Beale when quoting me. That way your question doesnt get missed by them. I'm not on the Tantares team.
- 22,647 replies
-
- 1
-
- totm march 2020
- mod
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
The engine placement is correct. See below. MEK used longer narrower engine sections than Aelita. (And I know they're both MEK, I'm just using different names for simplicity sake)
- 22,647 replies
-
- 5
-
- totm march 2020
- mod
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
@benjee10 Most of the Lockheed HLV parts have a temperature limit of 500 K, which is kind of low. The parts tend to sit around 300 K, which sets off temperature gauge's warning. Shouldn't the parks be 1500 K or something around that?