[KSP 1.12.1+] Galileo's Planet Pack [v1.6.6] [23 Sept 2021]

[Nicky21]

Ooooklay. So the stones are realy rare. good to know!

Regarding the crashes: i imagine the log contains no usefull data. I only posted it in case some other users happen to get crashes on niven too.

[darwinpatrick]

Are you playing on 1.9.1? I had a similar crash recently but the game never generated a crash report.

[The Minmus Derp]

So I'm compiling a giant stack of mods for my megagame and I'm wondering if GPP_Secondary still works for 1.9.1

[OhioBob]

58 minutes ago, The Minmus Derp said:

So I'm compiling a giant stack of mods for my megagame and I'm wondering if GPP_Secondary still works for 1.9.1

Yes, it should work fine.

[The Minmus Derp]

Thanks!

[The Minmus Derp]

It also says that I can download GPP Secondary in the OP, but there's no download link. Does it come with the main pack as an optional mod?

[OhioBob]

1 hour ago, The Minmus Derp said:

It also says that I can download GPP Secondary in the OP, but there's no download link. Does it come with the main pack as an optional mod?

Yes, it comes with the main pack, inside the folder "Optional Mods".

[The Minmus Derp]

YAY! I downloaded it, thank you very much. I can't wait to try it!

[Nicky21]

22 hours ago, darwinpatrick said:

Are you playing on 1.9.1? I had a similar crash recently but the game never generated a crash report.

1.9, yes. My crash rebooted my computer twice => no crash report. Every other time ksp crashed i got a nice log out of it.

[The Minmus Derp]

I think the Ciro system in GPP_Secondary is a liiiiitle close to the sun. It's like 1/100th the distance to Tersa/Iyo in 3LR, so that seems a bit close.

[JadeOfMaar]

@The Minmus Derp Thanks for noticing. Sounds good.

I'd like to mention that GPP has been around for nearly a solid 4 years and it wasn't trending back then to have star systems really far apart (afaik). GPP can be me moved out some but I would think only up to 20/100 that distance.

purely curious: what is Ciro's distance relative to Cercani of Other Worlds Rebooted?

[The Minmus Derp]

I don't have OWR. I would like to get it though. Does it work with 1.9.1?

[darwinpatrick]

@JadeOfMaar I figured it would be be most practical to just check the Cercani wiki for the star's orbital stats- https://outer-planets.fandom.com/wiki/Cercani- but (at least on my end) all the parameters are just error messages

[JadeOfMaar]

@darwinpatrick Oh that sucks majorly. I'll have to check for myself then: get the SMA numbers of Ciro, Cercani and whatever star in 3LR and compare them.

[darwinpatrick]

Whoever designed Catullus, thank you for the equatorial plateau... Despite a minor explosion on the way up Jeb was still able to make it to the Catullus orbital station thanks to the delta-v savings of starting at 13km altitude. Here's the best picture I got from the whole affair. If anyone's interested in the lander I can share that too

Spoiler

 

[darwinpatrick]

On a slightly related note, after taking a world's first contract to splash down on Tarsiss, I was at first slightly frustrated at the lack of any equatorial methane lakes, but after getting a drone to one and looking around I discovered just how cool it was that I got off the equator. Something about everything on an angle made for a view that was well worth the plane change.

Spoiler

Hats off to the devs on this. Thanks for making us work for the coolest views!
Also, I noticed from orbit that the lakes are a milky white but on the surface they're blue-green. Is this intended or a bug?

[OhioBob]

5 hours ago, darwinpatrick said:

Also, I noticed from orbit that the lakes are a milky white but on the surface they're blue-green. Is this intended or a bug?

They're not suppose to be white, sounds like a bug.

[frozenbinary]

For GPP should I be playing with Kerbalism or MKS/USI Life support?  Seems like there's a lot more thought put into MKS.

[hemeac]

1 hour ago, frozenbinary said:

For GPP should I be playing with Kerbalism or MKS/USI Life support?  Seems like there's a lot more thought put into MKS.

They are both pretty different experiences, but I think both can be enjoyable depending on the gameplay experience you want.  If you are new to KSP, think MKS/USI is more forgiving.  If you want to see Kerbalism in action, I've been watching Mike Aben's Expedition Eve series on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/c/MikeAben.  However, GPP support in Kerbalism appears to slotted in the next Kerbalism update.  If you are familiar with Github, the configs are there to grab to add to your installation.

Edited September 26, 2020 by hemeac

[frozenbinary]

18 minutes ago, hemeac said:

They are both pretty different experiences, but I think both can be enjoyable depending on the gameplay experience you want.  If you are new to KSP, think MKS/USI is more forgiving.  If you want to see Kerbalism in action, I've been watching Mike Aben's Expedition Eve series on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/c/MikeAben.  However, GPP support in Kerbalism appears to slotted in the next Kerbalism update.  If you are familiar with Github, the configs are there to grab to add to your installation.

Mike Aben actually reminded me about Kerbalism and decided to try it out with GPP and I've starting sending probes to Tellumo and Niven.  Just decided to check out the GPP wiki to see that the resources was made for MKS and that maybe I should switch.  Kerbalism's science is intresting anyway.

[Morphisor]

@Nobody6nvm this message here, mobile posting is very user unfriendly it seems.

Edited September 26, 2020 by Morphisor
How the hell did I post this here... Mobile browsing amirite.

[hemeac]

33 minutes ago, frozenbinary said:

Mike Aben actually reminded me about Kerbalism and decided to try it out with GPP and I've starting sending probes to Tellumo and Niven.  Just decided to check out the GPP wiki to see that the resources was made for MKS and that maybe I should switch.  Kerbalism's science is intresting anyway.

If you go to GPP/GPP_Resources/Res_CRP, you will be able to see which resources were added to GPP Planets.  Think they have added everything used in the MKS production chains.

Edited September 26, 2020 by hemeac

[frozenbinary]

2 hours ago, hemeac said:

They are both pretty different experiences, but I think both can be enjoyable depending on the gameplay experience you want.  If you are new to KSP, think MKS/USI is more forgiving.  If you want to see Kerbalism in action, I've been watching Mike Aben's Expedition Eve series on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/c/MikeAben.  However, GPP support in Kerbalism appears to slotted in the next Kerbalism update.  If you are familiar with Github, the configs are there to grab to add to your installation.

I think for now I'll just stick to my current Kerbalism save.  If I get tired of it I'll probably just try USI/MKS and some more mods.

[Space Nerd]

On 9/26/2020 at 4:09 AM, darwinpatrick said:

On a slightly related note, after taking a world's first contract to splash down on Tarsiss, I was at first slightly frustrated at the lack of any equatorial methane lakes, but after getting a drone to one and looking around I discovered just how cool it was that I got off the equator. Something about everything on an angle made for a view that was well worth the plane change.

  Hide contents

Hats off to the devs on this. Thanks for making us work for the coolest views!
Also, I noticed from orbit that the lakes are a milky white but on the surface they're blue-green. Is this intended or a bug?

Wow, is that red star grannus?

It's brighter than I thought!

[darwinpatrick]

Yep! If you get far enough from Ciro it gets faint enough that Grannus is comparably bright.