tater Posted May 8 Share Posted May 8 in progress Entry burn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tater Posted May 8 Share Posted May 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tater Posted May 9 Share Posted May 9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tater Posted May 9 Share Posted May 9 Polaris interview with Tim Dodd: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RCgothic Posted May 9 Share Posted May 9 I believe Polaris 1 will be a record for number of astronauts simultaneously in depressurised conditions? IIRC ISS and shuttle never had more than two at once. Apollo occasionally had 3 during depressurisations of the command module for stand up EVAs. Polaris will be 4. Unless different national missions randomly had spacewalks occur at once. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaceception Posted May 9 Share Posted May 9 I like that they went into designing this suit with the thought of how to scale up production. There's people on xitter wondering why SpaceX wants to make so many spacesuits, and some of them are the same people who decry SpaceX for not working on the items needed for human Mars missions. Yeah, I wonder. Anyway, apparently a PLSS is on the roadmap according to Isaacman, and Musk has tweeted the next-gen suit will be even better, so it looks like they're already working on the upgade. Might see some of those improvements during Polaris II. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GuessingEveryDay Posted May 9 Share Posted May 9 (edited) 1 hour ago, RCgothic said: I believe Polaris 1 will be a record for number of astronauts simultaneously in depressurised conditions? IIRC ISS and shuttle never had more than two at once. Apollo occasionally had 3 during depressurisations of the command module for stand up EVAs. Polaris will be 4. Unless different national missions randomly had spacewalks occur at once. Shuttle did have 3 once for when they captured a satellite that was spinning, STS-49. Technically Space Shuttle has the title of the first 3 on EVA, as Apollo 15, 16, and 17 had 2 astronauts go outside to recover film from an experiment mounted on the SM. Yes, all 3 were suited up, but only 2 actually stuck their heads outside, and only 1 person traveled across the ladder to grab the film. Edited May 9 by GuessingEveryDay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tater Posted May 9 Share Posted May 9 1 minute ago, Spaceception said: I like that they went into designing this suit with the thought of how to scale up production. There's people on xitter wondering why SpaceX wants to make so many spacesuits, and some of them are the same people who decry SpaceX for not working on the items needed for human Mars missions. Yeah, I wonder. Anyway, apparently a PLSS is on the roadmap according to Isaacman, and Musk has tweeted the next-gen suit will be even better, so it looks like they're already working on the upgade. Might see some of those improvements during Polaris II. It's like the goons who think this is somehow about making money, or sending rich people to Mars. It's all in service to colonizing Mars. Which again, I'm not against, but not "for," either (min understanding for me would be to first establish that 0.38g is congruent with long term human wellbeing, or it's a nonstarter). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GuessingEveryDay Posted May 9 Share Posted May 9 Also, that Intelsat footage is amazing to watch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaceception Posted May 9 Share Posted May 9 6 minutes ago, tater said: It's like the goons who think this is somehow about making money, or sending rich people to Mars. It's all in service to colonizing Mars. Which again, I'm not against, but not "for," either (min understanding for me would be to first establish that 0.38g is congruent with long term human wellbeing, or it's a nonstarter). Yeah, the first missions to establish a base should have dedicated medical studies to see if it's even feasible. How long should such a thing take to work out? The first decade or two? Longer? And now that I think about it, if Polaris II goes ahead as a Hubble maintenance/boost mission, we'll have to see EVA upgrades, to allow longer spacewalks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tater Posted May 9 Share Posted May 9 1 minute ago, Spaceception said: And now that I think about it, if Polaris II goes ahead as a Hubble maintenance/boost mission, we'll have to see EVA upgrades, to allow longer spacewalks. Given the lack of airlock/cargo bay/arm, they might need an EMU as well. Course that would have to be in the trunk? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaceception Posted May 9 Share Posted May 9 Just now, tater said: Given the lack of airlock/cargo bay/arm, they might need an EMU as well. Course that would have to be in the trunk? Yeah, and Musk did mention developing a 'jetpack' which is just going to be a fancier looking MMU so they could move around without tether length being an issue. The training for that alone will be interesting. Probably won't get many details or images for quite some time though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tater Posted May 10 Share Posted May 10 And it is moved an hour later. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tater Posted May 10 Share Posted May 10 live Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darthgently Posted May 10 Share Posted May 10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tater Posted May 10 Share Posted May 10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deddly Posted May 10 Share Posted May 10 Today I learned that Earth looks like Australia from a direct-to-phone satellite. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NFUN Posted May 10 Share Posted May 10 38 minutes ago, Deddly said: Today I learned that Earth looks like Australia from a direct-to-phone satellite. Always has been Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flavio hc16 Posted May 10 Share Posted May 10 1 hour ago, tater said: I would say, from the shape of the exclusion zone and what they say, that this is a WDR, so ift-4 on the 17-19 is doable I think Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tater Posted May 11 Share Posted May 11 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tater Posted May 11 Share Posted May 11 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrandedonEarth Posted May 11 Share Posted May 11 Four Superheavies stuffed in a Superhighbay? Starting to look like a gun magazine in there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minmus Taster Posted May 12 Share Posted May 12 2 hours ago, tater said: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minmus Taster Posted May 12 Share Posted May 12 I was reviewing the flight 3 footage and thought the interior of the ship looked kind of like a hollowed out zeppelin: Spoiler Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tater Posted May 12 Share Posted May 12 (edited) https://www.faa.gov/space/stakeholder_engagement/spacex_starship_ksc SpaceX Starship-Super Heavy Project at Kennedy Space Center Launch Complex 39A Project Updates Proposed Action The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) as the lead Federal agency intends to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of issuing a commercial launch Vehicle Operator License to SpaceX for the Starship-Super Heavy launch vehicle at Launch Complex 39A (LC-39A) at Kennedy Space Center (KSC), Florida. SpaceX proposes to construct launch, landing, and other associated infrastructure at and in proximity to LC-39A. The proposal would also include Starship-Super Heavy launches at LC-39A; recoverable Super Heavy booster and Starship landings at LC-39A or on a droneship; and expendable Super Heavy booster and Starship landings in the ocean. SpaceX must obtain a vehicle operator license from FAA for Starship-Super Heavy launch and landing operations. Issuing a vehicle operator license and approving airspace closures is considered a major Federal action under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). In consideration of SpaceX’s revised proposal, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and FAA have determined that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is the appropriate level of NEPA analysis to address the adjusted scope of Starship-Super Heavy at LC-39A. SpaceX will prepare the EIS under the supervision of the FAA which will serve as the lead agency at NASA’s request. While the 2019 EA prepared by NASA provides an analytical baseline, the environmental impacts of these proposed changes to Starship-Super Heavy LC-39A development and operations will be specifically analyzed in this EIS. The EIS will consider the potential environmental impacts of the Proposed Action and the No Action Alternative. The successful completion of the environmental review process does not guarantee that the FAA would issue a Vehicle Operator License. The project must also meet all FAA safety, risk, and indemnification requirements for the appropriate license. The above was updated Friday. Edited May 12 by tater Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.