Jump to content

Real Life "Kerbalisms"


Lisias

Recommended Posts

Italians and Russians are a very Kerbal combination!

From Space Age looking steam locomotives (yes, steam) for Siberia:

lg2.jpg

 

Ekranoplans:

lg7.jpg

These designs are really, really, really incredibly Kerbal. 

https://www.darkroastedblend.com/2008/05/extravagant-designs-by-luigi-colani.html

Of course, this crazily creative designer also made some industrial designs for Germany:

lg4.jpg

 

And for Japan:

lg9.jpg

 

And some "prosaic" automobiles:

lg10.jpg

lg14.jpg

 

The Kerbal Way™ has no limits!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"We had 2 cabinets of film, 75 lenses of varying focal lengths, 5 different trigger systems, a box half-full of filters, a whole collection of flash diffusers, color correction lenses, and two dozen batteries. Not that we needed all that for the shoot, but once you get locked into filming a nuclear explosion, the tendency is to go all out."

h79btb2SCww.jpg?size=1080x788&quality=95

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a theory that the Japanese abandoned shields because they had an archery-focused nobility with mega-pauldrons. However, the various Eastern Siberian tribes went further. A whole lot further.

scale_720

scale_720

scale_720

In Russian sources, it's known simply as a wing. Yes, this made curling up into a ball a legitimate battle tactic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

09yMPgKUv-o.jpg?size=1288x1252&quality=9

"Don't throw the rock away. Without it, the elevator doesn't work for children"

Posted on VK with a subtitle: now this is what we in IT call a "crutch"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bisnovat SK-1 . 

Man, it surely looks fast - but also looks… "weird". :) 

I found only two videos about it on Youtube, the more interesting one is below:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, DDE said:

The Chinese Air Firce museum has... well... a MiG-15 Alley. That's over two dozen J-2s and JJ-2s.

They might be different variants though. The lineup of J-6s (MiG-19 license built) is long too, but it is actually mostly different variants, because they made a lot of prototypes with minor improvements and then never mass produced them (it was the 70s).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey, did we have this one yet?

An-71 Madcap

1002439.jpg

Probably the nicest integration of an AWACS antenna ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, DDE said:

Hey, did we have this one yet?

An-71 Madcap

1002439.jpg

Probably the nicest integration of an AWACS antenna ever.

You know, I really like Russian designs. I concede that not all of them are practical, but I enjoy the attempt nevertheless.

You guys need to see what these guys did with computers in the 80s and 90s. :)

Disclaimer:

Spoiler

This statement should be seen in the technical context. Under no circumstances it should be considered as an endorsement for absolutely anything else.

 

Edited by Lisias
Disclaimer.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, DDE said:

Hey, did we have this one yet?

An-71 Madcap

1002439.jpg

Probably the nicest integration of an AWACS antenna ever.

Agree now the engine placement is weird but I assume this is designed to work from dirt runways. 
Now as engine sized increases they probably have to stop putting them below the wings. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, magnemoe said:

Agree now the engine placement is weird but I assume this is designed to work from dirt runways.

It helps on it, but the real reason is a thingy called Powered Lift.

See the NASA QSRA for reference.

The gains are good enough to some military jets used (some still do) it, as the F-104 on landings (acting like flaps). But not that good to be used by most commercial and/or civilian jets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, magnemoe said:

Agree now the engine placement is weird but I assume this is designed to work from dirt runways. 

Powered lift + dirt runways. Boeing had a very similar-looking wannabe C-130 replacement.

The regular An-72 gets a lot of mileage, even at the top of the world (An-74 has a navigator and beefed up batteries and APU, you know, the cold weather start-up shebang).

37_4.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DDE said:

Powered lift + dirt runways. Boeing had a very similar-looking wannabe C-130 replacement.

The regular An-72 gets a lot of mileage, even at the top of the world (An-74 has a navigator and beefed up batteries and APU, you know, the cold weather start-up shebang).

37_4.jpg

The Reversor is algo pretty interesting:

1024px-Antonov_An-74_2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

The interesting thing on this video is that while designing my own crafts, I got exactly the same problems and ended up exactly with the same results.

For example, when using flaps, I usually trim the elevators slightly down to compensate the tendency to have the nose up.

Watching these videos can help you to make better planes on KSP! (and vice versa!)

Besides that, this is an incredibly detailed tutorial on how to turn up these old beats of the past!! :)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...