Jump to content

Real Life "Kerbalisms"


Lisias

Recommended Posts

Rockwell C-1057, brought to life by the great Hazegrayart.

Don't have the slightest idea if Rockwell did it seriously, or if they were trying to troll NASA...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watched a group of folks try to build a computer program to simulate rocket launches.    It turned out pretty wobbly and needing moar boosters.    Then it exploded in a RUD.    

So Kerbal.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Lisias said:

I want to know how in hell the pilot would bail out of this death trap

He would just detach the plane from the back.

Spoiler

It is not the plane's propeller.

karlson-propeller-roof.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/30/2024 at 2:54 PM, Lisias said:

Check yo staging!!!!! :D

 

Average day in the Chinese space program:

But seriously:

kerbal ahh space program

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/3/2024 at 12:49 AM, Lisias said:

Blohm & Voss P 192

This is another one of that crafts that someone needs to build on KSP! :)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blohm_%26_Voss_P_192

3bb192.jpg

(http://www.luft46.com/bv/bvp192.html)

I want to know how in hell the pilot would bail out of this death trap... :P (or in how many pieces...)

And here's the 40k Vulture pretending it doesn't have that problem...

Vulture2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, DDE said:

And here's the 40k Vulture pretending it doesn't have that problem...

Vulture2.jpg

I would move the turbine back probably at the tail boom and let it rotate. then add some turbines for liftoff to the wings, probably add wheels. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/4/2024 at 2:39 PM, magnemoe said:

I would move the turbine back probably at the tail boom and let it rotate. then add some turbines for liftoff to the wings, probably add wheels. 

This thing made me remind of this french craziness: Leduc 022.

And... Yeah, the cockpit is essentially almost inside the intake!

Leduc-022.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

During the Battle of Vyborg in July 1790 Swedish capital ships preparing to break through a Russian blockade were towing three fireships. Now, accounts vary: some blame the captain of the fireship Postiljon for getting drunk, igniting the ship too early and then committing a series of navigational mistakes; others claim that the ship of the line Enigheten that was towing him had chosen a risky method of commencing movement, first setting sail, then cutting anchors, all while failing to check staging release the tow on the fireship. Either way, Postiljon rear-ended the 74-gunner and became entangled; Enigheten in turn lost control and collided into the 40-gun frigate Zemire. The resulting mess, on fire, drifted towards the Russian ships Vseslav and Pathelemon, while the cooking-off guns of the deserted ships were recorded as scoring hits on the Russian flagship St Peter, before the inevitable violent detonation that further contributed the the pandemonium, the incident alone causing nearly as much damage as the Russians ever managed in that battle.

800px-Russian_victory_vyborg.jpg

Edited by DDE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/24/2024 at 1:32 PM, Lisias said:

Crazy, almost desperate idea from WW2 era: doing MEDEVAC on pods mounted on the bomb mounts of a P-38.

What could possibly go wrong? :) ("Bombs awa..." uh... Whoops.. :sticktongue:)

(but it would be a hell of view!)

Experimental-air-ambulance-version-of-th

 

https://aviationhumor.net/experimental-air-ambulance-version-of-the-p-38/

Found its Soviet cousin, the "Bakshaev casette".

https://t.me/tarkhils_channel/3163

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tests of captured A-4s by the Soviets. Note item 2

FZ7lL86HTHE.jpg?size=709x549&quality=96&

Flight distance, km: 231

Trajectory altitude, km: 46

Lateral deviation, km: left 181

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, kerbiloid said:

I just wonder, how could the V-2 aim even at London, rather than "somewhere behind the channel".

They didn't They aimed somewhere behind the channel, hoping that some of the V2s would hit London! They managed to be right about 50% of the time! :)

Quote

"Tests of prototype V-2's in 1943 indicated a 4.5 km CEP (circular error probable - the radius within which 50% of the shots impact). 100% of the shots fell within 18 km of the target. A radio beam guidance update system was introduced in December 1944, which in tests produced a 2 km CEP. In reality, in the campaign against Britain, 518 rockets were recorded as falling in the Greater London Air Defence Zone of 1225 fired, implying an average CEP of 12 km."

source: http://www.astronautix.com/v/v-2.html

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

250px-Car_top.JPG

Post-Medieval Russian bronze SRB on a test carriage (added later).

Notice the spherical tanks. They are probably for attitude control.

Also those handles. You can add moar struts.

(Two similar pipes are in Istanbul museum.)

Caliber 890 mm, so basically can shoot with Kerbals if use as a cannon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...