intelliCom Posted November 24, 2022 Share Posted November 24, 2022 (edited) 5 minutes ago, tater said: Really feels like you're peering over with this rotated view. Love it. Edited November 24, 2022 by intelliCom Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeSchmuckatelli Posted November 24, 2022 Share Posted November 24, 2022 3 hours ago, intelliCom said: Is this relative to surface rotation, or is the 24-hour loop not considered? Also, gotta say, that eccentric orbit drop from the sky looks a little extreme for reentry of a human-rated vehicle, but maybe it does relatively softer aerobraking passes like Apollo did?. I think the key is the earth centric view. Change the view to be sun centric and then the path won't look so extreme Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kerbiloid Posted November 24, 2022 Share Posted November 24, 2022 (edited) 7 hours ago, Gargamel said: Still doesn’t beat Voyager. Until Artemis has a meat payload, they’re the same thing. As one of conspiracy theories told that Lunokhod was driven by a suicidal midget spaceman sitting inside, we should not ignore the possibility that Voyagers are also based on the midget-in-the-middle scheme. Somehow the idea of Kerbals flying in Mk1 for decades has appeared from somewhere... This would also explain, how did they update the software, point the antenna, and so on, for decades, with technologies of early 1970s. Edited November 24, 2022 by kerbiloid Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tater Posted November 24, 2022 Share Posted November 24, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beccab Posted November 24, 2022 Share Posted November 24, 2022 15 hours ago, sevenperforce said: "Orion will be entering a distant retrograde orbit beyond the moon, breaking the record set by Apollo 13 for the [greatest distance from Earth achieved] by a [pressurized spacecraft with sufficient internal volume to hold multiple humans and an outer mold line suitable for controlled atmospheric re-entry] at 248,655 miles from Earth." Although I wonder if even that is true. It seems to me that there's a pretty substantial difference between the distance to the Moon at perigee and at apogee, which might need to be taken into consideration. At perigee, the moon can be as close to Earth as 356,400 km (221,500 miles), while at apogee it can be as far as 406,700 km (252,700 miles). So if any of the Apollo missions took place close to apogee, their command module parking orbits may well have been farther from Earth's surface than Orion. It's also unclear whether the number provided by NASA above is actually a measurement of distance from Earth's surface or if it is based on distance from the center of the Earth. Wayne hale agrees Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barzon Posted November 24, 2022 Share Posted November 24, 2022 8 hours ago, intelliCom said: Is this relative to surface rotation, or is the 24-hour loop not considered? Also, gotta say, that eccentric orbit drop from the sky looks a little extreme for reentry of a human-rated vehicle, but maybe it does relatively softer aerobraking passes like Apollo did?. I'm not sure Apollo did anything but direct atmospheric entry, but Orion will be doing a skip-reentry Orion Spacecraft to Test New Entry Technique on Artemis I Mission | NASA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kerbiloid Posted November 24, 2022 Share Posted November 24, 2022 9 minutes ago, Barzon said: I'm not sure Apollo did anything but direct atmospheric entry If it didn't, it would face 30 g instead of 7. It was gliding in a re-entry corridor. 10 minutes ago, Barzon said: Orion will be doing a skip-reentry Gliding is not necessary a skip-reentry. To the moment it's a single re-entry. *** The intrigue is: will they test a normally controlled re-entry, or a non-controlled emergency case. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darthgently Posted November 24, 2022 Share Posted November 24, 2022 7 hours ago, kerbiloid said: midget-in-the-middle scheme The internet generates so many clever phrases I long ago became mostly jaded. But you have broken through that ice and gave me a good laugh here. Thanks for that. The image in my head of a midget aboard one of the Voyagers reading a well worn copy of Hitchhikers Guide for the 23,583th time will be treasured Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kerbiloid Posted November 24, 2022 Share Posted November 24, 2022 The most known example of this tech design principle. Spoiler Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tater Posted November 25, 2022 Share Posted November 25, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
intelliCom Posted November 25, 2022 Share Posted November 25, 2022 3 hours ago, tater said: Is there a reason why Earth looks so fuzzy here? Out of focus maybe? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kerbiloid Posted November 25, 2022 Share Posted November 25, 2022 To blur the lamp reflection on the Earth model. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikegarrison Posted November 25, 2022 Share Posted November 25, 2022 It's a GoPro camera, off the shelf. It probably has some autofocus issues focusing on something that is a few meters away and also something that is hundreds of thousands of kilometers away in the same shot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tater Posted November 25, 2022 Share Posted November 25, 2022 They altered the gopros, or at least some of them. Different lenses, added heaters, etc. I would expect that they'd have large depth of field, particularly in that bright environment, otherwise I might think it was motion blur (the spacecraft is always fixed, as the cameras are stuck to it). But you'd think the exposure time would be incredibly short, else they'd blow out all the white, so that seems unlikely. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeSchmuckatelli Posted November 25, 2022 Share Posted November 25, 2022 (edited) 8 hours ago, mikegarrison said: It's a GoPro camera, off the shelf. It probably has some autofocus issues focusing on something that is a few meters away and also something that is hundreds of thousands of kilometers away in the same shot. @intelliCom Tater posted this up thread and I found it informative Edited November 25, 2022 by JoeSchmuckatelli Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tater Posted November 25, 2022 Share Posted November 25, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cuky Posted November 25, 2022 Share Posted November 25, 2022 Sorry if this is double post, but I can't seem to find that anyone did post this clip Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotius Posted November 25, 2022 Share Posted November 25, 2022 Heh. Not only SpaceX has trouble with launch pad being too weak for the giant it's supposed to send to space. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kerbiloid Posted November 26, 2022 Share Posted November 26, 2022 It's a progress. Iirc, Lara Croft had to sprint away through a tunnel after pulling the rocket launch handle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SunlitZelkova Posted November 26, 2022 Share Posted November 26, 2022 It’s about time! Jim Free got the memo. Orion does indeed hold the record for farthest distance traveled by a mission with a spacecraft designed to carry humans to deep space and safely return them to Earth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minmus Taster Posted November 26, 2022 Share Posted November 26, 2022 3 hours ago, SunlitZelkova said: It’s about time! Jim Free got the memo. Orion does indeed hold the record for farthest distance traveled by a mission with a spacecraft designed to carry humans to deep space and safely return them to Earth. I miss you Snoopy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rutabaga22 Posted November 26, 2022 Share Posted November 26, 2022 (edited) Will the modules of gateway be similar to ISS modules or will they be different? Also, will it need to reboost? 3rd question, will dragon XL be needed for resupplying gateway when starship is a thing? Edited November 26, 2022 by Rutabaga22 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cubinator Posted November 26, 2022 Share Posted November 26, 2022 What happens on Gateway if there is a solar flare? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tater Posted November 26, 2022 Share Posted November 26, 2022 52 minutes ago, Rutabaga22 said: Will the modules of gateway be similar to ISS modules or will they be different? Also, will it need to reboost? 3rd question, will dragon XL be needed for resupplying gateway when starship is a thing? Stationkeeping for NRHO is minimal, and that's what the PPE is for. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NFUN Posted November 26, 2022 Share Posted November 26, 2022 On 11/24/2022 at 12:59 AM, kerbiloid said: As one of conspiracy theories told that Lunokhod was driven by a suicidal midget spaceman sitting inside, we should not ignore the possibility that Voyagers are also based on the midget-in-the-middle scheme. Somehow the idea of Kerbals flying in Mk1 for decades has appeared from somewhere... This would also explain, how did they update the software, point the antenna, and so on, for decades, with technologies of early 1970s. yeah I loved Omon Ra Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.