Jump to content

[1.8.1 - 1.9.1] Kopernicus Continued

prestja

By prestja
in KSP1 Mod Releases

 Share

Recommended Posts

R-T-B

R-T-B

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, prestja said:

Hm, what planet pack? Any errors in the logs?

He's using -2, he probably has the OceanFX bug that -3 fixed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OhioBob

OhioBob

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, prestja said:

Hm, what planet pack? Any errors in the logs?

Grannus Expansion Pack, planet Taranis.

I do see some errors in the logs but nothing that seems to be related to the ocean texture.

2 hours ago, R-T-B said:

He's using -2, he probably has the OceanFX bug that -3 fixed.

If that's the case, the problem may have already been fixed.  We should probably just wait and let me test it again in -3.  If the problem persists, I'll let you know.

(edit)  I see that -3 is now on GitHub.  The link in the OP still goes to -2.  I'm going to test it now.

(edit 2)  False alarm, works fine in 1.9.1-3.  Sorry to have bothered you.

 

Edited by OhioBob
Link to comment
Share on other sites
R-T-B

R-T-B

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Hohmannson said:

Is massively levitating scatters bug supposed to be fixed in 1.9.1-3? I`ve just caught it with GEP-Primary on 1.9.1

It should be, yes.   I think that was only in release 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
maxs139

maxs139

Posted
Posted

@R-T-B Bug Report!

KSP Version 1.10 clean install

Mods: Kopernicus (multiple versions tried), ModularFlightIntegrator, ModuleManager, Hyperedit, RealExoplanets (link below)

 

Kopernicus will not load Real Exoplanets (REX) on any of the 1.10 versions. Versions tried: Dev110-release 3 as well as the github dev110 release. Also tried dev191 which didn't even try to load the pack. Oddly using Presja's 1.9.1-3 pre-release as well the build from your master branch it works. I realize they're releases for 1.9.1 but they still work on KSP 1.10 and REX loads/works. Here are the log files for each version tried (subfolders labeled with versions are inside the single zip file) https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mCgWZ8whjIvOm3nZoSGGHIby08xtZ2t1/view?usp=sharing

Link to comment
Share on other sites
R-T-B

R-T-B

Posted
Posted (edited)

The 1.10 release has a bug with systems with more than two gas giants, I am working on it.

1 hour ago, maxs139 said:

Oddly using Presja's 1.9.1-3 pre-release as well the build from your master branch it works.

Yeah, that's because it doesn't include my buggy gas giant work around (it prevents every gas giant from turning into a Jool appearance).  Thanks for the reports everyone.  As soon as I identify another way to disable Jool shaders on new gas giants, I will make another release for 1.10.

Edited by R-T-B
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Poodmund

Poodmund

Posted
Posted

Would allowing us to specify a material in the scaled space node be a good way to handle it? The default would be the lagacy shader so no additional info would be required and then if you want to use the new system, specify the new shader and then have a node inside the scaled space node where all the new shader's material properties can be set?

Thats, of course, if I'm understanding the implmentation correctly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
R-T-B

R-T-B

Posted
Posted (edited)
29 minutes ago, Poodmund said:

Would allowing us to specify a material in the scaled space node be a good way to handle it? The default would be the lagacy shader so no additional info would be required and then if you want to use the new system, specify the new shader and then have a node inside the scaled space node where all the new shader's material properties can be set?

Thats, of course, if I'm understanding the implmentation correctly.

That's the end goal, really.  At the moment the code works more like "Look for a templated Jool, take away it's shaders at construction by rebuilding the body from scratch" and obviously that's not working correctly at the moment.  I hope to allow a full interface to control the Joolian shader system as well as opt for it eventually.  But the first fix will likely just remove Jool's shaders from templated worlds automatically.

Edited by R-T-B
Link to comment
Share on other sites
prestja

prestja

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 hour ago, Poodmund said:

Would allowing us to specify a material in the scaled space node be a good way to handle it? The default would be the lagacy shader so no additional info would be required and then if you want to use the new system, specify the new shader and then have a node inside the scaled space node where all the new shader's material properties can be set?

Thats, of course, if I'm understanding the implmentation correctly.

Absolutely, that way mod authors such as yourself could opt-in to the new Joolian shaders on a planet-by-planet basis. Is this something you're considering for OPM?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shawn Kerman

Shawn Kerman

Posted
Posted (edited)

I have 941 loaded in Ksp 1.10, my cfg is working well but I had to move its AFTER from [Kopernicus] to [XPCR]

I will update the number loaded when the game starts up fully again.

Also @prestja  you should add the kopernicus Wiki link: https://kopernicus.github.io/wiki/ and Kopernicus Discord: https://discord.gg/XmVp23s to the OP of the thread.

Edited by Shawn Kerman
Link to comment
Share on other sites
R-T-B

R-T-B

Posted
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Shawn Kerman said:

I have 941 loaded in Ksp 1.10, my cfg is working well but I had to move its AFTER from [Kopernicus] to [XPCR]

I will update the number loaded when the game starts up fully again.

You were most helpful in diagnosing the issue with Joolian-templated (Gas Giant) bodies, btw.  I hope to have a fix pushed out tonight.

4 minutes ago, Minuense said:

Hey @R-T-B I'm down to test out the build as well! I created the account just now though so I cant pm you either. Could you pm it to me as well? Thank you!!!

I'll put you on the list.  You should receive a build this evening when next prerelease happens (the old one has a nasty bug with gas giants, don't worry about missing out on it).

Edited by R-T-B
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shawn Kerman

Shawn Kerman

Posted
Posted

Technically the the posts above mine talk about how jool's shader get transferred to all planets with a jool template and how the shader has been disabled. I posted "Every gas gaint has the same name" is because I haven't seen anyone comment about it yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Poodmund

Poodmund

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, prestja said:

Absolutely, that way mod authors such as yourself could opt-in to the new Joolian shaders on a planet-by-planet basis. Is this something you're considering for OPM?

Potentially yes, but by implementing it the way I suggested (or similarly in the correct node location) keeps backwards compatibility with existing packs and also would follow convention with the implementation of new shaders like the triplanar terrain shader.

I would urge all new contributors to study the existing config syntax and structure, looking at the Kittopia stock body dumps and also looking at a range of the existing popular mods out there to get an understanding of how mods that use Kopernicus expect to be written with regards to their celestial body configs. It's a pain, not only, having, to fix bugs and get new feature implementation working but also considering third party mod dev usage but I think it's one that is still quite important to the makers of the Kopernicus packs to use Kopernicus' full potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OhioBob

OhioBob

Posted
Posted
55 minutes ago, HansonKerman said:

I don’t want to sound stupid but did the other Kopernicus made by Thomas p die or what I’m confuzzzled

Thomas' Kopernicus still works and is the go to version up through KSP 1.8.1.  But that's where it ends.  For KSP 1.9.1 and newer, you're going to have to use Kopernicus Continued.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
R-T-B

R-T-B

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, Poodmund said:

Potentially yes, but by implementing it the way I suggested (or similarly in the correct node location) keeps backwards compatibility with existing packs and also would follow convention with the implementation of new shaders like the triplanar terrain shader.

I would urge all new contributors to study the existing config syntax and structure, looking at the Kittopia stock body dumps and also looking at a range of the existing popular mods out there to get an understanding of how mods that use Kopernicus expect to be written with regards to their celestial body configs. It's a pain, not only, having, to fix bugs and get new feature implementation working but also considering third party mod dev usage but I think it's one that is still quite important to the makers of the Kopernicus packs to use Kopernicus' full potential.

That is exactly what is planned longterm.  For right now we are focusing on just getting a compatible loader going though, then we will focus on adding an interfacing method to work with the new shaders.

I'm pushing out a new build of 1.10 to testers now.  Should fix the Joolian name issue and other gas-giant issues, fingers crossed.

13 hours ago, Al2Me6 said:

@R-T-B, I'm also happy to test 1.10 builds for you. I don't know much about C#, but perhaps I can still be of some help.

Thanks!

Added to list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
coyotesfrontier

coyotesfrontier

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Not a Spy said:

ive been experincing a bug, no matter what planetpack i use, no matter the mods i have installed, the game will load but i cant load my savegame

Maybe something would be helpful in this situation, for the mod devs. Can you guess what it is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...