Jump to content

KSP 2 Parts Parity Part Deux


RayneCloud

Recommended Posts

So being awake early and bored, and having counted the parts out before out of sheer boredom, I thought it would be neat to make a more visual representation of the parts parity KSP 2 has with KSP 1. This is just part 1 to see if anyone is interested in more? I just thought it was neat to see what parts are missing, and what new parts we got.


apdknujgfbla1.png?width=771&format=png&a

As a note, the "Command Section" is missing 2 parts from KSP 1 Stock but we gained 5 new parts. So, we went from 23 parts of this type to 26. So a net gain  quite literally :)

Sections

Command: Posted Above
Fuel Tanks: WIP
Engines: https://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/index.php?/topic/214189-ksp-2-parts-parity-part-deux/&do=findComment&comment=4249806
Structure: WIP
Coupling: WIP
Payload: WIP
Aerodynamics: WIP
Ground: WIP
Thermal: WIP
Electrical: WIP
Communication: WIP
Utility: WIP

 

Edited by RayneCloud
Added Update Links to new Sections, spelling and grammar.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RayneCloud said:

Later in the day, kiddo to school and then I'll get to it before work. :)

No rush, we have plenty of time

Especially if the updates are coming in "weeks" :joy:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Truth :sob:

Side note, there's 12 total categories of part in KSP 2 and the one that's changed the most (I think) is fuel tanks, (followed by aerodynamics parts) so, these two sections might be a bit off.... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, RayneCloud said:

So being awake early and bored, and having counted the parts out before out of sheer boredom, I thought it would be neat to make a more visual representation of the parts parity KSP 2 has with KSP 1. This is just part 1 to see if anyone is interested in more? I just thought it was neat to see what parts are missing, and what new parts we got.


apdknujgfbla1.png?width=771&format=png&a

As a note, the "Command Section" is missing 2 parts from KSP 1 Stock but we gained 5 new parts. So, we went from 23 parts of this type to 26. So a net gain  quite literally :)

But what about Restock+ and the...
zmPiAaO.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Vl3d said:

But what about Restock+

Here you go.

+----------------------------------------------+
|Original Restock+ Part | Is this part in KSP2?|
|        All            |            No        |
+----------------------------------------------+

 

Edited by Superfluous J
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Vl3d said:

But what about Restock+ and the...
zmPiAaO.png

This is still mk2 lander can. What's missing is the second variant. And all part variants in fact. But the part is there.

Speaking of categories, there's no longer a Control cat (the one with RCS and SAS), it's all under Utility now.

Still, all things considered, there will be net gain despite the lack of wing panels and science bits.

Edited by The Aziz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, The Aziz said:

This is still mk2 lander can. What's missing is the second variant. And all part variants in fact. But the part is there.

Speaking of categories, there's no longer a Control cat (the one with RCS and SAS), it's all under Utility now.

Still, all things considered, there will be net gain despite the lack of wing panels and science bits.

I guess for Utility parts in KSP 2  that were in the first game, there'd be a combination of KSP categories

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Engines Section is Done, (Tank Section is Huge, gonna take a bit.)

 

SfbA0NM.pngsq8xYSP.pngHnsIKPd.png

Note: Engine Plates not only obsolete some older engine parts, but massively increase engine options and layout options for lifters, transfer stages, landers, etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, RayneCloud said:

Engines Section is Done, (Tank Section is Huge, gonna take a bit.)

 

SfbA0NM.pngsq8xYSP.pngHnsIKPd.png

Note: Engine Plates not only obsolete some older engine parts, but massively increase engine options and layout options for lifters, transfer stages, landers, etc

The image could use some light gray lines to separate rows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, bigyihsuan said:

hehe, I mostly miss the 1.825m parts.

It'd be better if they had a proper Soyuz booster tank though, that thing was a travesty of wrong proportions. Kind of glad it's gone, myself, I don't have to look at it.

Edited by regex
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...