klesh

what version of the game are you using?

Well all are gonna buy the farm one day, babe. It's what you do with the time you have that counts. Ol' Gene used his time wisely.

GeForce Experience user? Turn off the Share option in the settings.

I first heard of it when I was in the closed, pre-alpha test crew for DayZ; on Skype calls with Dean Hall and the gang, and he was big into the game then.

Give this a check out if you haven't fellas. http://apollo17.org/ Gene and company had fun time at launch, babe.

Just saw this as well. He was one of my favorite astronauts. Great life though, you can't be sad for a guy that got to walk on the moon in his lifetime. Thats a full, rich life right there.

Timewarp to morning at KSC hasn't been mentioned. Some of these little things I actually don't like, but the vast majority have been good improvements in my mind.

Its the new console from Nintendo, coming out March 3, 2017. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nintendo_Switch

Hello, welcome to the forums! *toasts you with a vodka* In your second picture, it looks like your station core is potentially a sub-assembly which is lacking any kind of attachment node? You can use the re-root tool on the red-outlined station core to make one of the docking ports the root, which should give it a node to attach to the cargo bay. Alternatively, you can rebuild the station core inside the cb, by starting with a docking port and building the rest of the core behind it. As far as it not fitting inside the Mk3 cargo bay, if it don't fit you must not quit! You either have to redesign it such that it will fit, or launch the core on a one-off big rocket launch, with the core inside a fairing. Good luck!

I like this option best.

Dude, c'mon. Give me a little credit would you? 1,450 full liquid fuels, and 1 Mk1 Command pod.

Launched a vessel with 1,400 of them. KSP crashed on getting out of the VAB, lol. Point taken.

Might as well post that too: I've never noticed the performance hit, but my machine is very much able to handle KSP.

I was wondering why it wasn't tex.texnl.com, haha.

Its unfortunate, because that list of mods creates such a great looking game. The clouds in particular are great. There is no way I am going to put that much effort into making the game look, frankly, like a game should in 2017 right out of the box. You need art work desperately, Squad.

They're being hosted on a site called "http://tex.texel.com/", presumably Tex_NL's website, if that helps at all. They're shots of a structural tree dangling decouplers and stack separators over verticle poles, a sort of ring toss experiment. They've all been dropped and are perched on top of their poles.

"Seeing anything" as in the p[ictures displaying properly? I see them just fine.

As an aside, I recently did this with the Mk1 structural fuselage, and it is in fact properly hollow... which is nice.

Unfortuntely no. Edit: No need to drop them, just decouple them from atop a pole.

You might want to tell Nintendo that. They're still advertising it as being released in 2016. (and still using my screenshot of Duna to sell it.) http://www.nintendo.com/games/detail/nBwARgzbaULD-_d5KoZbkQIVxQSv2R5y

Thanks!

Hi, Felt like blowing some stuff up today, searched google for BD armory on the forums here. Went to this thread where the final post directs me to the new BD armory thread, except I don't have the permission to see that content. Whats going on?

I never ever use them.

Take a close look at Squad's premade seaplanes Gull, Mallard, and Osprey for inspiration and engineering concepts. You can see them if you allow default crafts in the difficulty settings of a new sandbox game.

Yup. It's wild isn't it? You'll see and get a feel for it when you do it. Going so slow at such a high AP, you'll see your trajectory rotate sooo much faster when you planechange than back down low going fast. It's an essential "ah hah!" lightbulb moment that will serve you will in your future advanced spacetravels. Good luck!