-
Posts
24,927 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Developer Articles
KSP2 Release Notes
Everything posted by linuxgurugamer
-
You are correct, and I've come up with a fix (I think). I'm waiting for someone to confirm (I'm at work, can't really start up KSP right now) Putting link here in case anyone want to try it, but I'm watching the RCS BuildAid thread about this. https://www.dropbox.com/s/6ebvryoohq7rcxh/RCSBuildAidBetaSkinFix.zip?dl=0 FYI. The author is not available, so this is mostly an unofficial build, although I think he is aware of my efforts.
-
I haven't had a chance to test, but this should fix it: https://www.dropbox.com/s/6ebvryoohq7rcxh/RCSBuildAidBetaSkinFix.zip?dl=0 Just replace the DLLs with these, and let me know how it is.
-
I'm convinced. I'll take a look at it later
-
First,I would consider that a Mechjeb bug. Mechjeb is not wrapping text. Second, what version of KSP, what version of Mechjeb, what version of RCSBuildaid, etc. Log file as well.
-
It isn't this, at least I don't think so. But it might be Janitor's Closet. Do you have that installed?
-
KSP1 Computer Building/Buying Megathread
linuxgurugamer replied to Leonov's topic in KSP1 Discussion
I have been known to have 30-40 tabs open, a 10-15 gig ramdisk, 3 or 4 Visual Studio sessions opened, plus other misc programs -
Copy and paste on a phone doesn't work too well I'm sorry if I left out a word with you found the importent. And I hope you are joking about the Goblin it was about the worst thing ever built. Hard to fly unstable Etc
-
KSP1 Computer Building/Buying Megathread
linuxgurugamer replied to Leonov's topic in KSP1 Discussion
I'd make sure the new motherboard can take up to 32 gig of memory. Be able to keep more in memory will become more important over time. My system has 32 gig memory and I still run out. -
Actually, according to wikapedia: The YF-12 was a twin-seat version of the secret single-seat Lockheed A-12 reconnaissance aircraft, which led to the U.S. Air Force's Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird twin-seat reconnaissance variant.
-
[1.2, 1.3] KW Rocketry Redux 3.1.1.1 released
linuxgurugamer replied to linuxgurugamer's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
Those brackets and parens are not meant to be matching, they are used for the search algorithm. I'll watch for your video in about an hour or so when I get home. -
[1.2, 1.3] KW Rocketry Redux 3.1.1.1 released
linuxgurugamer replied to linuxgurugamer's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
Nothing significant changed, can you post a video? Also, are you using autostrutting? -
It's in my sig, but to make it easy: Read this BEFORE asking for support: http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/index.php?/topic/83212-how-to-get-support-read-first/
-
[1.3] Smartstage, intelligent VAB reset button 2.9.7
linuxgurugamer replied to xytovl's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
you can't do anything about the first post. If I do, it won't be before the weekend, I'll let you know. I can do the update on CKAN, so you won't need to do anything -
Log file, please Also, how did you install it? What version of KSP, and what version of the mod?
-
[1.3] Smartstage, intelligent VAB reset button 2.9.7
linuxgurugamer replied to xytovl's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
are you still looking for someone to take it over? -
[1.3] Smartstage, intelligent VAB reset button 2.9.7
linuxgurugamer replied to xytovl's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
Just an FYI, the author has stated he isn't playing KSP anymore and wouldn't mind if someone else took this over. So, I may do that over the weekend. LGG -
[1.3] Smartstage, intelligent VAB reset button 2.9.7
linuxgurugamer replied to xytovl's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
I may be looking into this one, with an eye to adopt it -
Not a fighter, it was a CIA spy plane. Unarmed. And about Mack 2.3 or so, not 4
-
Make Jool a planet you can land on.
linuxgurugamer replied to sirgoodman's topic in KSP1 Suggestions & Development Discussion
I haven't played with the hooligan airships mod but I think you could fly around Jool in the atmosphere without ever landing on it using this mod -
Umm, F15, I think has had zero losses?
-
It's GOING to be a good plane. But it is more than a fighter, and you said fighter. If you are including all active jets, then you left out several very significant planes. For example, the A-10 Warthog . Best ground attack jet, period. The B1, F117, B52, B2, etc. All jets, all great at what they were designed for. But. You need to define the question. Best at what? The F-35 is a multi-purpose jet it's more than a fighter it's a fighter it's Interceptor it's a bomber it's a ground attack playing the trying to do so much with it and it's intended to replace all of the above listed planes except the dedicated bombers