Jump to content

Svm420

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,019

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Svm420

  1. Svm420
    hi @Alex Starlight, Really appreciate the mod just wanted to give some feedback. With this mod installed I am unable to scroll the advanced filters, the ones hidden and revealed by the arrow at the top of the filters left of the basic categories. Without the mod you can set you mouse anywhere in the advanced filters and use the scroll wheel to scroll the list up and down, or left click to drag the list up and down. With the mod install the list wont scroll unless you have the pointer precisely between the filter squares in the 2-3 pixels space between them making scrolling very cumbersome and frustrating. I hope the issue can be resolved because I really enjoy using your mod. Happy to test an fixes if that helps. Thanks!
  2. Svm420
    @rockmeowstar I was wondering if you could fix the textures of the storage containers of the KIS mod found here. They appear fully glossy and have a mirror finish which looks strange TBH. I haven't found another mod that has nice inventory containers like these. I know your more focused on fixing glass/window textures, so if this is beyond your scope I understand. Thank you either way for your work thus far!
  3. Svm420
    The difference is; when the periapsis parts were made the creator named that part of the part thrust_transform not trustTransform. So when you told the game to give that part a plume it was trying to find a not existent part of the part, AKA misnamed. In the future when making configs for a part it is always a good idea to check the parts original CFG file to ensure proper naming conventions. it isn't often that people use their own naming convention, but every time I have had an issue like you did that was the cause. I found the solution for you by doing eactly that I went to the original CFG file and went to the ModuleEngines module and checked what the thrustVectorTransformName was set to. Hope that makes sense.
  4. Svm420
    The thrust transform for the part you are working on is different than the config you copied from. @pr4ger Change thrustTransform -> thrust_transform
  5. Svm420
    Love the mod. I have a request. I was wondering if you can make it so the float for detail is saved/loaded? I keep having to modify the value when painting. Thanks
  6. Svm420
    Have either of you told the people who run CKAN? It occurs to me that they might be more inclined to assist since your issue wouldn't be without CKAN...
  7. Svm420
    What is it you think that engine, the d-30, can do that the stock jet engines don't do? If you are looking to match performance of the real thing then trying to avoid AJE is like missing the point of AJE. Which is to model the IRL performance as best we can. I say this because how this mod works is it just clones the stock jet model for the turboJet and uses AJE to give it the stats it need to be like the engine IRL. without AJE i don't know what you would gain from making another jet engine when we have a turbojet and turboramjet already.
  8. Svm420
    I tried the GDrive link in the OP it led to a dead page.
  9. Svm420
    That looks amazing. Thank you for do that!
  10. Svm420
    There was this mod that let attached parts move with animations
  11. Svm420
    From my own experience of making aset iva's I think it can only be done in unity. You can use blender to make and edit part, but not IVAs AFAIK YMMV. The guide for unity setup you linked looks correct to me. As far as details regarding props and the cfgs for them. I would look at the RPM github and see if there is documentation to help you. As far as action sets. I don't think there was any props were made after they were added to the game. So i don't think there is a way to see or control from IVA only. It may require code updating in RPM for it to even be possible.
  12. Svm420
    The latter
  13. Svm420
    IF you add this MM patch it will fix the clamps in the editor. @PART[launchClamp1]:AFTER[Restock] { @MODULE[ModuleRestockLaunchClamp] { %instancingEnabled = false } }
  14. Svm420
    I have this installed but what "prop search bar..." are you referencing?
  15. Svm420
    That makes sense. Don't know why i didn't realize that. Could the stock pointer/arrow of the gauges be replaced with the thumb you created or something similar? I am most curious if we can keep the numerical readouts you added as it makes the gauges more useful at a glance and remove the space squad wasted. Just trying to think of something straight forward that would allow that.
  16. Svm420
    I see you moved the red area of the throttle gauge to the bottom to fix the alignment. Do you think you would be able to remove the unused section of the throttle and have the needle work correctly? It would make the gauge capable of finer readout if we could utilize the full area. I want to know what Squad was thinking back in the day to design a gauge where like 25% isnt used This mod is stock for me and the new ZUI addition is the cherry on the sundae. Thank you!
  17. Svm420
    Kramax autopilot is the mod
  18. Svm420
    I have a request. I would like to be able to right click the toolbar icon to quickly open or close the mod filter window. Would be a nice QOL feature. Thanks.
  19. Svm420
    I have always wondered. Could we get rid of the -5 to 0 of the G gauge? It doesn't actually function that way. Negative gees still read on the positive side. Also the throttle above 100 Just a personal peeve of mine.
  20. Svm420
    @MirageDev What made you go for RPM as opposed to MAS? I thought RPM was being phased out for the new and improved MAS.
  21. Svm420
    Is this still true?
  22. Svm420
    Does this require anything on the docking port side of things, as in does it need special ports, or can it be used on existing docking port parts?
  23. Svm420
    Are you aware of the simple logistic mod. It may offer features you are looking for.
  24. Svm420
    @MOARdV I am getting weird numbers when I use IAS for airspeed. They are quite a bit higher than what I get when I use the IAS readout in the FAR GUI. I think your formula for calculating IAS may be wrong. It at least appears different than the calculation FAR uses. It appears FAR takes the sqroot of density * pressure ratio, and you take srfspeed * Sqroot of density * pressure ratio. If you would please take a look. Happy to test any changes.
  25. Svm420
    @dkavolis Would you still consider this request? Thanks!
×
×
  • Create New...