Jump to content

Bej Kerman

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    5,012

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Bej Kerman

  1. Bej Kerman
    Where?
  2. Bej Kerman
    I warp to any other celestial body. I just don't warp to Kerbin orbit. You warp to any other celestial body? But your idea implies you don't mind sitting for hours, or even days when going between moons. Are you saying that timewarp is needed? Because it is. Everyone else timewarps, even across "short" distances. Bottom line: independent timewarp stays, and your idea has to center around that. Timewarp is a critical feature, whether interplanetary or in orbit. It's hasty to decide no-one else needs timewarp for low Kerbin orbit.
  3. Bej Kerman
    Because I was trying to explain how even attempting to try and make mov And I was only going along.
  4. Bej Kerman
    Prove that probes are a safer alternative to Kerbals? Prove that people would like to spend hours programming just to have less control than they would otherwise? Ask them yourself [snip]
  5. Bej Kerman
    You only dock to your own agency's craft or to another agency's but only after requesting and receiving permission. So if you don't get accepted, you can just ram the docking port and cause more damage than if you were allowed to dock? I never warp to get to orbit. There will be no warping close to the planet in multiplayer, I'm sure of it. You never warp to get to the Mun, or even Minmus? Go on, do that without warping, and you'll see how badly timewarp is needed in KSP.
  6. Bej Kerman
    KSP 1's original lore made it clear the monoliths are the origin of the Kerbals.
  7. Bej Kerman
    Rask and Rusk should be evidence enough you don't have to simulate tidal effects to just model the effects in a static manner. Literally my first message to you here was me agreeing that the planets don't need to move. You don't like it when I misquote you, so why are you misrepresenting me? Everything on from that point was me just going along for the sake of it. Why are you insisting that the planets need to move and have simulated tidal effects?
  8. Bej Kerman
    I'm not you and don't find programming fun. I do, however, find piloting fun. That seems to be the majority of people here, also. Bottom line still being don't do latency at all. It won't be "same as kerbal without kerbal" at all. Kerbals can reproduce, run colonies, etc. Probes can't do that. Bottom line is still, of course, don't do latency at all.
  9. Bej Kerman
    The moon causes significant tides, and you're telling me that if an Earth-sized planet were to pass closer to Earth than the moon is, just barely skimming the atmosphere, that tidal forces don't mean anything in that situation? Et cetera et cetera, whatever. Temperature and roche spheres can be static values, it doesn't matter.
  10. Bej Kerman
    Or just don't do latency at all, that would be preferable.
  11. Bej Kerman
    Realistic =/= difficult. People seem to think FAR is more difficult than the stock game, but that's far from reality. The idea that realism makes things difficult only goes so far.
  12. Bej Kerman
    ? This isn't needed anyway
  13. Bej Kerman
    So you propose that probe cores should be reworked? Honestly, I agree with you on that one. No, I didn't say that. I propose we do away with input latency. Full control, no latency. Pre-programmed inputs in-lore, whatever. There's no reason to hinder gameplay for silly challenge aspects that don't do anything to make the game any more rewarding or fun. [snip]
  14. Bej Kerman
    No because they always get stranded in the trailers. I still think it's plain daft to think the mun rocket is hinting at anything.
  15. Bej Kerman
    Then the rocket has to come back.
  16. Bej Kerman
    Maybe you should concentrate on the class instead
  17. Bej Kerman
    Why should preprogramed maneuvers be limited to a few vectors? It's full control or bust.
  18. Bej Kerman
    Almost certain based on what pattern? I'd like to see it the same way as you do, but the next one being about a Mun landing needs some pretty conclusive evidence to be "almost certain". Aziz is just making stuff up now I'd say it sounded more like it came from Minecraft, or something similar to C418's style. I'm still sad Andrew Prahlow is being neglected in the wider gaming industry.
  19. Bej Kerman
    Then the other parts would be too small to match the structural parts.
  20. Bej Kerman
    What is the top half of the screen showing? Why is the front door of the VAB seemingly clipping through a ground?
  21. Bej Kerman
    1. Why 2. What in the world is ibb.co
  22. Bej Kerman
    In other words, not sci-fi.
  23. Bej Kerman
    By showing procedural radiators due to "heat needs" and futuristic engines, it's kind of implied that yeah, we are gonna have nuclear reactos in space, heck, since they're going scifi we might even have fusion. We're not going sci-fi, and I wouldn't say fusion is necessarily sci-fi.
  24. Bej Kerman
    I agree with everything else, but here you imply that 1. Unity is bad, or at least worse than Unreal (which it isn't) 2. That having planets move and influence each other gravitationally would be difficult. This has already been modded into KSP 1.
  25. Bej Kerman
    Key words: the first probes to go interstellar will be preprogramed. Since when were preprogramed probes only able to point at a few specific vectors? Bottom line: user input is preprogramed. The only thing that needs delay is science transmission.
×
×
  • Create New...