Jump to content

SkyFall2489

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    550

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by SkyFall2489

  1. SkyFall2489
    C 44
  2. SkyFall2489
    C 44
  3. SkyFall2489
    What would it take to rack-mount RESOURCE nodes as well as MODULE nodes? Doesn't seem to be much harder, but I have 0 experience with DLLs.
  4. SkyFall2489
    That's going to be in very high demand.
  5. SkyFall2489
    Now it has two.
  6. SkyFall2489
    NOT MKS, USI-LS. USI-LS works without MKS in a simplified way, but still works. It needs USI tools as a dependency, but not USI Core. MKS is an incredibly complex mod that would be very hard to support with such a major change to the game like SIMPLEX Resources.
  7. SkyFall2489
    Squash those bugs!
  8. SkyFall2489
    C 48 You rally one team, I rally the other! @Tundra @James Kerman
  9. SkyFall2489
    C47
  10. SkyFall2489
    For context, this is an attack animation from a video game (Genshin Impact) with the dialogue "I Will Have Order!"
  11. SkyFall2489
    If you go for USI-LS without MKS, you could just add in the definitions for Fertilizer, Mulch, and Supplies (or patch USI-LS to use simplex's resources), and change the ISRU patch to use HydrateOre instead of Ore.
  12. SkyFall2489
    And I'm pretty sure SSPXr doesn't have a 1.875m greenhouse, I might be wrong
  13. SkyFall2489
    Making History, stock. I just want something a little smaller to go with my existing 1.875m modular mothership designs. There are plenty of 1.875m mods out there too, like planetside and Buffalo 2.
  14. SkyFall2489
    Feature request: 1.875m parts
  15. SkyFall2489
    @theJesuit does this support Moldavite Machines?
  16. SkyFall2489
    @theJesuit, Would it be possible to add configurations for other life support mods? I tried SIMPLEX Kerbalism and found it too complex.
  17. SkyFall2489
    My laptop is already starting to smoke just displaying this
  18. SkyFall2489
  19. SkyFall2489
    Seriously, that's how a lot of my ships come together. For the inspiration, you just need a general shape - it doesn't have to already be in KSP. That's how you make replicas. Except, as a MacBook user, I have a 300 part slideshow.
  20. SkyFall2489
    Someone else did testing from Mun and found that it saved more delta v than a direct burn from LKO. I modified my mothership a bunch, sacrificing looks for performance, and now I doubt I'll need that much refuelling at all.
  21. SkyFall2489
    C 50
  22. SkyFall2489
    Ah. well my ship can survive 50km periapsis and apoapsis near minmus, so that reentry from eve should be fine without a heatshield. I could always install an airbrake module too.
  23. SkyFall2489
    C 50
  24. SkyFall2489
    It's not time, it's the 900 m/s of Delta-V. I have a few mission plans available: 1. refuel at gilly and LKO (saves a lot of delta V) 2. refuel at gilly and munar orbit (saves even more delta v, but now I have to reload crew and fuel at the mun - which means getting that there in the first place) 3. refuel at gilly, stop in LKO (easiest and simplest, but costs the most fuel) 4. refuel at gilly, stop in low munar orbit (again, have to get stuff to the mun, but it saves some fuel) For any plan I can: Eve aerobrake (risky, saves around 400 m/s) Kerbin aerobrake (Saves 1 km/s if stopping in LKO, saves 500 m/s if stopping in low munar orbit) Both of these would likely require a heat shield module to be attached, which increases fuel needed due to its weight, decreases fuel available due to TWR, and removes a possible spot for a crew module. (As I am using CSMs for control and propulsion, I might be able to detach a CM's SM and put it on the front to act as a mini heat shield, but the ship will not be well protected.)
  25. SkyFall2489
    C 50
×
×
  • Create New...