-
Posts
4,585 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Developer Articles
KSP2 Release Notes
Everything posted by GoldForest
-
While the Twin-Boar is BASED off Pyrios, Pyrios the Twin-boar is not. Twin-Boar is also way under-sized, Pyrios would be 3.125m or 3.75m diameter in scale. It also doesn't quite look like Pyrios. It has a similar shape, yes, but I'd rather have an exact replica.
-
lol, true, but I'm not asking for anything really other than Pyrios, as it was, and I think still may be, a contender for the boosters on the SLS. But I understand if you don't want to do it.
-
The most expensive cubesat launcher ever. Also, is pyrios planned at all? Would like to have these sexy LRBs for SLS:
-
I think they meant in KSP terms, which I think the top is 6.25m and the bottom is 10.625m.
- 22,648 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- totm march 2020
- mod
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
BDB recently got an optional update to switch hypergolic engines to use hypergolic. It's a simple one use all hypergolic, but maybe this could be something to look into? @Pappystein Made the hypergolic patch, maybe they could help you? Perhaps make the AJ10 rely on hypergolic and the RCS rely on mono?
-
1140? Is that KSP tonnage? And true, you can single launch bases simply using a Saturn MLV. LMLV and AMLLV (Side question, why did they rearrange the name?) will definitely be useful in KSP 2. Like I mentioned in my use cases, direct launch to other solar system would cut down travel time by months to years. But seriously, why the name change? Anyone know? They went from Large Multipurpose Launch Vehicle to Advanced Multipurpose Large Launch Vehicle? Is it because AMLLV sounds better than LMLV? Amullove vs Lemlove? Oh baby! A quadruple!
-
Well, LMLV would have a purpose. Single launch Mun base missions, Single Launch Duna Base missions, Single Launch anywhere in the kerbolar system missions. And for those with other solar systems, a way to quickly launch a mission there. I mean, why use a Delta Heavy with complicated slingshot maneuvers when you can just one shot a 100 ton craft there. LMLV was made to lift 3.5 Million pounds. That's close to 1,600 metric tons. In KSP that's about 800 tons? Give or take a hundred? I would like an 800 ton lifter. I could put a Saturn V on Lathe!
-
Sea Dragon? Nah. Sea Dragon weak. Give me, Super Orion Nuclear Pulse Propulsion Interstellar Ark: But that's a little big, even with Hanger Extender, so I'll settle for: Boeing's Large Multipurpose Launch Vehicle: A rocket powered by SRB's the width of the Saturn V and a core with a aerospike the size of a small island. I also think the aerospike used SMART tech, so it was recoverable.
-
3.75M. No Ariane 6 parts, but you can kitbash the Ariane 6 using the Ariane 5 core, Ariane 5 Second stage and the Vega First Stage boosters.
-
Full album: Imgur: The magic of the Internet Shuttle Derived Heavy Lift Launch Vehicle (SDHLLV) lifting Orion into KEO.
- 619 replies
-
- 14
-
-
You only like the C-8B because it's basically a "Fat"urn (Fat-Saturn) and people seem to like the 'fat' rockets. Fatlas and LDC Titan. I like it because big rocket, very powerful. Also, I do genuinely like the shape. I mean, Saturn I has the same shape and I've heard no one call it ugly. (I'm talking about the ORIGINAL Saturn I, the Saturn C-1 with Centaur/S-V) And again, I'm just following the design on Wikipedia: Saturn C-8 - Wikipedia Not so much the drawing as the physical dimensions mentioned in the side bar.
-
"MOOSE, originally an acronym for Man Out Of Space Easiest but later changed to the more professional-sounding Manned Orbital Operations Safety Equipment,[1] was a proposed emergency "bail-out" system capable of bringing a single astronaut safely down from Earth orbit to the planet's surface." MOOSE - Wikipedia Summary: Escape pod to bring astronaut back to Earth in the e vent of catastrphic failure of lifeboat/spacecraft and/or station emergency in which getting to the lifeboat is impossible, such as station break up. The kitbash real C-8 or my kitbash of a fictional C-8B?