zw_45 Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 (edited) Some issues about the OGO satellite. According to this figure on NASA documentary, the experiment boom 2 and 3 on OGO should be UHF and VHF antenna. I checked the NSSDC webpage, the charged particle experiments (on boom 3 in game) was done on the forward experiment boom, and the probe does not have gravity experiment (on boom 4 in game) onboard. However, it has a trapped radiation experiment on one of the OPEP. https://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/nmc/spacecraft/displayExperiment.action?spacecraftId=1966-049A Edited March 12 by zw_45 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zarbon44 Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 20 hours ago, CobaltWolf said: Think of it as a teaser, if you will... Hide contents If you know, you know You need a REALLY big plane for this "Missile". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zorg Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 On 3/11/2024 at 2:39 AM, DaveyJ576 said: @Zorg, outstanding work as always. The attention to detail is amazing. Thank you for all of this work. By the way, the earliest version of the MA-1 powerplant that flew on the first three Atlas A test flights (Atlas 4A June 1957, Atlas 6A in September 1957, and Atlas 12A in December, 1957) actually had cone-shaped nozzles for the two booster engines. The first two flights ended in failure, but 12A succeeded in flying a 600nm flight. As part of the crash engineering troubleshooting process following the first two failures, Rocketdyne shifted to bell-shaped nozzles, but they were not ready for the 12A flight. Atlas 10A flew successfully on January 10, 1958, the first with bell-shaped nozzles, establishing the standard for all further Atlas flights. This was almost a SpaceX style iterative approach to rocket design. Build it, fly it, blow it up, fix it, fly it again. In this case they were doing it because they had no choice due to limited (as compared to today) ground testing capabilities and not because it was part of the Rocketdyne/Convair corporate mantra. Just a historical FYI for everyone, don't spend the time redoing the nozzles. Interesting, didn't know about this tbh. I've got a fair amount of Atlas A pics in my refs but none of the conical nozzles. But probably not worth doing even if I had though, if as you pointed out only a handful of flights used them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Razgriz1 Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 5 minutes ago, Zorg said: Interesting, didn't know about this tbh. I've got a fair amount of Atlas A pics in my refs but none of the conical nozzles. But probably not worth doing even if I had though, if as you pointed out only a handful of flights used them. Atlas 8A at the Strategic Air Command and Aerospace Museum has conical booster nozzles, though for some reason they also stuck a sustainer engine on it for display. I agree though that it probably isn't worth doing for Atlas. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CobaltWolf Posted March 12 Author Share Posted March 12 5 minutes ago, Razgriz1 said: Atlas 8A at the Strategic Air Command and Aerospace Museum has conical booster nozzles, though for some reason they also stuck a sustainer engine on it for display. I agree though that it probably isn't worth doing for Atlas. It's not even a sustainer engine, it's just... the lower half of a booster bell? 11 hours ago, zw_45 said: Some issues about the OGO satellite. According to this figure on NASA documentary, the experiment boom 2 and 3 on OGO should be UHF and VHF antenna. I checked the NSSDC webpage, the charged particle experiments (on boom 3 in game) was done on the forward experiment boom, and the probe does not have gravity experiment (on boom 4 in game) onboard. However, it has a trapped radiation experiment on one of the OPEP. https://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/nmc/spacecraft/displayExperiment.action?spacecraftId=1966-049A Thanks for letting us know! I'll try and take a look at that soon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zw_45 Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 (edited) Here’s another thing I found about probe science - the Stanford antenna on Pioneer 6 and the dipole antenna on Alouette actually function as frequency sounder to study the electron density in ionosphere. It might be appropriate to add bd_ionelec experiment to those antennas. https://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/nmc/experiment/display.action?id=1965-105A-04 https://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/nmc/experiment/display.action?id=1962-049A-01 Edited March 12 by zw_45 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zorg Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 3 hours ago, CobaltWolf said: It's not even a sustainer engine, it's just... the lower half of a booster bell? It could be a bell from a sustainer, the very first LR105 was not aspirated, just had the exhaust off to the side based on the illustrations I've seen. Don't have a photo of a full engine though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pappystein Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 8 hours ago, Zorg said: Interesting, didn't know about this tbh. I've got a fair amount of Atlas A pics in my refs but none of the conical nozzles. But probably not worth doing even if I had though, if as you pointed out only a handful of flights used them. The only way it would be worth it is if you were doing the RZ.1 or RZ.2 for the Bluestreak as it would be the same model Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pappystein Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 On 3/11/2024 at 2:19 PM, CobaltWolf said: Think of it as a teaser, if you will... Reveal hidden contents If you know, you know It's sad that one of the pilots of this aircraft died mid-airing into my Semi-truck.... err avatar 5 hours ago, Zorg said: It could be a bell from a sustainer, the very first LR105 was not aspirated, just had the exhaust off to the side based on the illustrations I've seen. Don't have a photo of a full engine though. I am pretty certain that if you get a picture of that from a different angle you can see that the center engine is literally some of the First gen slab sided XLR-89 bells cut and spliced together it isn't a LR-105 (telling is the flat shelf just below the skirt) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hikerchick29 Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 How do you get this to work with Textures Unlimited? I installed both, as well as the recolor depot, through CKAN. But the Apollo command module just shows up as a semi-reflective dull grey, even with the game's reflective settings turned up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gupyzer0 Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 7 hours ago, zw_45 said: Here’s another thing I found about probe science - the Stanford antenna on Pioneer 6 and the dipole antenna on Alouette actually function as frequency sounder to study the electron density in ionosphere. It might be appropriate to add bd_ionelec experiment to those antennas. https://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/nmc/experiment/display.action?id=1965-105A-04 https://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/nmc/experiment/display.action?id=1962-049A-01 Maybe you should do a pull request for this feature. It's not hard to add experiments to the config files and the BDB guys might be willing to accept this small change Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blufor878 Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 On 3/9/2024 at 12:56 PM, Zorg said: Some more Atlas updates the chronological order is reversed here, from left to right: Atlas D, C, B and two version of Atlas A. Of course all the other core tank variants such as the derivatives of Atlas D, E/F, II, III all to be done so loads more work lol. Man, I'm probably gonna abuse this when it releases. Don't ask how. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultim32 Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 17 minutes ago, Blufor878 said: Man, I'm probably gonna abuse this when it releases. Don't ask how. I'm still trying to find a way to side-decouple superheavy boosters like the falcon heavy. Surface attach won't cooperate tho Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blufor878 Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 58 minutes ago, Ultim32 said: I'm still trying to find a way to side-decouple superheavy boosters like the falcon heavy. Surface attach won't cooperate tho Yeah, I noticed that the Atlas tank parts don't work with side/surface attachments. I assumed it was because that they were pressurized balloon tanks IRL. I might be wrong though. Y'all feel free to correct me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeadJohn Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 12 hours ago, Ultim32 said: I'm still trying to find a way to side-decouple superheavy boosters like the falcon heavy. Surface attach won't cooperate tho 11 hours ago, Blufor878 said: Yeah, I noticed that the Atlas tank parts don't work with side/surface attachments. I assumed it was because that they were pressurized balloon tanks IRL. I might be wrong though. Y'all feel free to correct me. The Atlas 1/2 stage skirt (I forget the exact part name) allows radial attachment. I've put small SRBs on it to increase liftoff TWR. You can "abuse" that by putting decouplers and huge SRBs on the skirt, followed by offsetting to move the decouplers higher on the rocket. Hold shift key while offsetting to increase the maximum allowed distance. It will look like the decouplers are connected to the tank but they are really on the skirt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultim32 Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 (edited) I meant the SpaceX superheavy. Sorry if you thought I meant something from BDB. Edited March 13 by Ultim32 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CobaltWolf Posted March 13 Author Share Posted March 13 13 hours ago, Blufor878 said: Yeah, I noticed that the Atlas tank parts don't work with side/surface attachments. I assumed it was because that they were pressurized balloon tanks IRL. I might be wrong though. Y'all feel free to correct me. Yes, it's intentional. It's actually a tag that you can apply to colliders in Unity that prevents radial attachment, regardless of the attach rules for the part. I discovered it around the time of the last Atlas revamp. It felt like it was an opportunity to introduce some interesting decision making for the player - in terms of 1.875m "workhorse" rockets, you had two options. You could go for maximum single-stick performance with the balloon tank Atlas, but if you needed something more than that, you'd have to move to the less efficient Titan, which allowed for multiple cores and thus scaled more at the higher performance end. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blufor878 Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 I told you I'd abuse Atlas. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gupyzer0 Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 Been making my own tech tree for a while and with the new Atlas revamp coming I guess it's time for me to split my tankage line into balloon tanks and "normal" tanks just after Thor/Jupiter tanks. If you remain in the "normal" line you'll have to work with Titan if you go Balloon then you have the chance to unlock Atlas/Centaur. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CobaltWolf Posted March 13 Author Share Posted March 13 On 3/11/2024 at 5:08 PM, Adventures said: We got the X-15 in the house? On 3/12/2024 at 10:33 AM, Zarbon44 said: You need a REALLY big plane for this "Missile". Since you've all been good... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blufor878 Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 31 minutes ago, CobaltWolf said: Since you've all been good... Well, now we're all obliged to fling this into space for...science or something... In any case this looks great! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoldForest Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 31 minutes ago, CobaltWolf said: Since you've all been good... Instead of giving us a B-52 to launch the X-15, how about giving us the gliding Saturn S-IC-D? Eh? Eh? I kid, I kid. I know you're basically done with Apollo stuff with BDB 1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pudgemountain Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 1 hour ago, CobaltWolf said: Since you've all been good... Space Pencil!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gupyzer0 Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 1 hour ago, Blufor878 said: Well, now we're all obliged to fling this into space for...science or something... In any case this looks great! Ah yes ... the science ... Perhaps strapping this into a Titan will give us some of that stuff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blufor878 Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 58 minutes ago, Gupyzer0 said: Ah yes ... the science ... Perhaps strapping this into a Titan will give us some of that stuff. See, this guy gets it. Although you spelled Saturn V wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.