Kellanium Posted August 10 Share Posted August 10 On 8/10/2024 at 1:14 AM, Pappystein said: Before opening the spoiler below, make certain you understand, you break it, you bought it. I have been using dev builds for years and I still break a download atleast once every month or two! If you still want to know: Reveal hidden contents In the OP, click the Github link Click CODE on the left side of the screen Big green button that says master... click A dropdown appears Grey button directly below the BDB logo that says master, Click, Selection menu appears Choose 1.14 Development Green button to the right of that that says Code again Choose to download ZIP. Install it (make certain correct files go to correct places. Some files you need in place 1 and others need to be in place 2 or 3 to work!) Expand I end up restarting my save file about once every three weeks anyway. its like back when i used linux. i expect things to break so i don't get too attached Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodger Posted August 10 Share Posted August 10 (edited) On 8/10/2024 at 1:20 AM, slyfox023 said: for some reason the LEM rover won't unfold when I tried to deploy it, does anyone know why? Expand Do you have KJR too? Using KJR Next instead of KJR Continued may give better results, but it's hard to replicate the issue. I'd also recommend installing KSP Community Fixes too just in case. Stock autostruts should be unable to cross an unlocked robotic joint, so I'd be somewhat surprised if it was stock autostruts causing it, but definitely worth trying different settings there too. Make sure you have advanced tweakables on in the game settings to be able to change the autostrust settings. On 8/9/2024 at 8:08 PM, DaveyJ576 said: @Pappystein, @Rodger, has the Upper Stage Thrust Buff patch been updated for the new Titan configs, or is it operational as is? Does it work with the Hypergolics patch or is that overkill (if there is such a thing in KSP )? Expand Upper stage buff patch should be fine with the hypergol patch. The hypergol patch doesn't actually change any thrust values, so they don't conflict at all. And the version on dev does cover the Titan update, giving the LR91 and LR87-LH2 1.5x thrust (and mass). Edited August 10 by Rodger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdrianDogmeat Posted August 10 Share Posted August 10 SM-65F Atlas LORV - 550th Strategic Missile Squadron Fleet Low Observable Reentry Vehicle [LORV] Reveal hidden contents Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AmateurAstronaut1969 Posted August 10 Share Posted August 10 (edited) Here's something I think you all might like, Atlas L/Atlas II/Atlas CELV (all the same thing) was the competitor proposal to Titan IV for the CELV contract, and had some interesting derivatives, which I decided to make Atlas L/Centaur, Late 80s: Reveal hidden contents Growth Option 1, early 90s: Now this one ain't bad, just hang the existing Atlas L from a pair of RSRBs, pretty fun! One tiny modification though, we actually have to downgrade Atlas and remove it's common dome so we have have a lower attachment point for the booster struts This one's my favourite <3 Such a good sep pic Growth Option 2, late 90s: Now this one's cursed. Resurrect J-2, redesign the core stage to be longer and LH2, stretch Centaur T a LOT, and top that off with a Skylab fairing (I secretly love it tho) The Engineers were certainly 'creative' with this one Edited August 10 by AmateurAstronaut1969 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveyJ576 Posted August 10 Share Posted August 10 On 8/10/2024 at 8:06 PM, AdrianDogmeat said: SM-65F Atlas LORV - 550th Strategic Missile Squadron Fleet Low Observable Reentry Vehicle [LORV] Reveal hidden contents Expand Very well done. What part did you use for the RV? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kellanium Posted August 10 Share Posted August 10 Didn't take pictures but jeb survived his first X-15 flight. His X-15 didn't survive the flight, but Jeb did, and that's what matters. Maybe next time Jeb will figure out how to properly kill velocity before he hits the troposphere Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdrianDogmeat Posted August 10 Share Posted August 10 (edited) On 8/10/2024 at 10:24 PM, DaveyJ576 said: Very well done. What part did you use for the RV? Expand Procedural Parts + Resized KH-7 SM Edited August 10 by AdrianDogmeat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kellanium Posted August 11 Share Posted August 11 (edited) In the dev branch w/ the hypergolic patch the Titan I first stage tanks both default to hypergol despite the TI using kerolox. Sorry if its a known issue. Also might be my setup which is...super janky atm. EDIT: this is definitely an issue with my sloppy installation, please disregard Edited August 11 by Kellanium Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodger Posted August 11 Share Posted August 11 On 8/11/2024 at 1:23 AM, Kellanium said: In the dev branch w/ the hypergolic patch the Titan I first stage tanks both default to hypergol despite the TI using kerolox. Sorry if its a known issue. Also might be my setup which is...super janky atm. EDIT: this is definitely an issue with my sloppy installation, please disregard Expand The different tank subtypes just can't have different default fuel types. There's tips in the part/switch descriptions about needing to set Titan I tanks to LFO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodger Posted August 11 Share Posted August 11 Small update for people using dev, the Atlas skirts have been merged into a single new part, so the "old" new skirts are being soft depreciated, and I'll remove em fully in a week or two. Just in case people were using them in new craft files, so you have time to update them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zorg Posted August 11 Share Posted August 11 MSD/SGS fairing and Atlas H MSD structural adapter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoldForest Posted August 11 Share Posted August 11 Just realized we're about a month and a half, plus change, away from BDB's 9th anniversary. I know the 9th isn't a big deal, that would be the 10th. But I was wondering, do you have anything planned for the 9th anniversary @CobaltWolf ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kellanium Posted August 11 Share Posted August 11 (edited) Does using fluorozine give me a real advantage? no. but, counterpoint, rocket plume green Also, dev branch seems to load and run much faster than 1.13. Impressive. Edited August 11 by Kellanium Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodger Posted August 12 Share Posted August 12 On 8/11/2024 at 7:12 PM, GoldForest said: Just realized we're about a month and a half, plus change, away from BDB's 9th anniversary. I know the 9th isn't a big deal, that would be the 10th. But I was wondering, do you have anything planned for the 9th anniversary @CobaltWolf ? Expand I suggest a can of Dr Pepper On 8/11/2024 at 9:11 PM, Kellanium said: Does using fluorozine give me a real advantage? no. but, counterpoint, rocket plume green Expand I mean the higher isp is a pretty nice bonus too lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave1904 Posted August 12 Share Posted August 12 @Pappystein I'm making a fluorine,lithium Hydrogen tank type and was wondering if you or anyone else here would know the mixture ratios for an engine like that. Roughly at least. Atm I have it at LqHydrogen 3.75 Lithium 0.75 Fluorine 0.25 I've went for a 15:1 hydrogen flurine mixture but have no idea how much lithium is ideal. 15:3:1 was a wild guess haha. My current tank has half the mass of hydrogen/oxygen and it seem quite op. Any recommendations? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoldForest Posted August 12 Share Posted August 12 Any fix for the, for lack of a better word, "non-shininess" of the Atlas LV3 and Atlas II lower tank parts in the works? They still appear, for lack of a better word, 'matte'-like. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TomVorat Posted August 12 Share Posted August 12 On 8/12/2024 at 8:23 AM, GoldForest said: Any fix for the, for lack of a better word, "non-shininess" of the Atlas LV3 and Atlas II lower tank parts in the works? They still appear, for lack of a better word, 'matte'-like. Expand Aren't dedicated PBR textures on their way? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoldForest Posted August 12 Share Posted August 12 On 8/12/2024 at 8:50 AM, TomVorat said: Aren't dedicated PBR textures on their way? Expand They're already in the DEV branch. Look at the top of the Atlas. That's PBR shininess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zorg Posted August 12 Share Posted August 12 (edited) On 8/12/2024 at 9:10 AM, GoldForest said: They're already in the DEV branch. Look at the top of the Atlas. That's PBR shininess. Expand You're still looking at Deffered's automatic conversion. The old specular channels are being reworked as dedicated smoothness maps and there are still a few inconsistencies Im working on. For the textures to be loaded into dedicated PBR shaders together with the newly added metalicity maps you need to wait for a new update to Shabby to be publicly available. Edited August 12 by Zorg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoldForest Posted August 12 Share Posted August 12 On 8/12/2024 at 9:27 AM, Zorg said: You're still looking at Deffered's automatic conversion. The old specular channels are being reworked as dedicated smoothness maps and there are still a few inconsistencies Im working on. For the textures to be loaded into dedicated PBR shaders together with the newly added metalicity maps you need to wait for a new update to Shabby to be publicly available. Expand Ah, okay. Sorry. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoldForest Posted August 12 Share Posted August 12 Atlas IIASxIII launching a random CommSat I built. Full album: Imgur: The magic of the Internet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kellanium Posted August 12 Share Posted August 12 On 8/12/2024 at 5:10 AM, Rodger said: I mean the higher isp is a pretty nice bonus too lol Expand I mean yeah but even without the flourozine my comsats end up with about 700-1000 m/s dV post-circularization in HKO (vs about 1200 for the fluorozine) (also i know fluorozine is the opposite of how it should be but hydrafluor doesn't sounds as cool. Zs make things cool) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pappystein Posted August 12 Share Posted August 12 On 8/12/2024 at 7:48 AM, dave1904 said: @Pappystein I'm making a fluorine,lithium Hydrogen tank type and was wondering if you or anyone else here would know the mixture ratios for an engine like that. Roughly at least. Atm I have it at LqHydrogen 3.75 Lithium 0.75 Fluorine 0.25 I've went for a 15:1 hydrogen flurine mixture but have no idea how much lithium is ideal. 15:3:1 was a wild guess haha. My current tank has half the mass of hydrogen/oxygen and it seem quite op. Any recommendations? Expand I have no data on Lithium with Fluorine. But FLOX+ LH2 is a valid fuel mix that was actually tested. The ratio is 6:1 LH2 to FLOX. Flox + RP1 was also tested, 5-8% ISP bump depending on the ratio of Fluorine to Oxygen with Atlas MA-3s No I do not plan on extending the Fluorine patch I made to LF/O engines as a rule. Just stating that FLOX was tested with atlas engines. I am considering, doing the FLOX/LH2 mixture for the RL10 engines (and maybe MAYBE an LR87 or J-2.) MAYBE even a Fl2/LH2 mix... not certain yet... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdrianDogmeat Posted August 12 Share Posted August 12 Atlas 23F Agena-D - Seasat-3 SAR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kellanium Posted August 12 Share Posted August 12 On 8/12/2024 at 9:22 PM, Pappystein said: I have no data on Lithium with Fluorine. But FLOX+ LH2 is a valid fuel mix that was actually tested. The ratio is 6:1 LH2 to FLOX. Flox + RP1 was also tested, 5-8% ISP bump depending on the ratio of Fluorine to Oxygen with Atlas MA-3s No I do not plan on extending the Fluorine patch I made to LF/O engines as a rule. Just stating that FLOX was tested with atlas engines. I am considering, doing the FLOX/LH2 mixture for the RL10 engines (and maybe MAYBE an LR87 or J-2.) MAYBE even a Fl2/LH2 mix... not certain yet... Expand According to Ignition: An Informal History of Liquid Rocket Propellants by John D. Clark, Rocketdyne tested a Lithium/Flourine/LH2 tripropellant rocket in the 60s, and it got an impressively high ISP of 542s. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.