Jump to content

SpaceX Discussion Thread


Skylon

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Geonovast said:

All Falcon Heavy launches have had RTLS for the side boosters except for ViaSat-3, which was fully expended.

They have yet to do a dual drone ship landing.

There hasn't been a center core recovery either, correct?  An RLTS of side boosters with drone ship landing for center core would be stellar.  As I recall they attempted this on the Tesla/Starman launch

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, darthgently said:

There hasn't been a center core recovery either, correct?  An RLTS of side boosters with drone ship landing for center core would be stellar.  As I recall they attempted this on the Tesla/Starman launch

First three FH launches attempted a recovery of the center core.  1 and 3 didn't land, 2 (Arabsat 6A) landed but the octograbber wasn't set up for the FH core and therefore wasn't used.  It fell over on the trip back.

So strictly speaking they got half of a center core back.

maxresdefault.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, darthgently said:

Photoshop concept art needed:

When considering possible SS missions involving an expended booster might as well strap 2 to 4 recoverable F9s to the big booster to milk it for all its worth. 

Not much of a photoshop but it's something.

Looks more cursed than I was expecting.

Screenshot-2023-10-03-140952.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Deddly said:

Bing decided that Starship should be much bigger, and much more Kerbal

 

OIG.lI4.SFrtA_OCkcjw_2uI?pid=ImgGn

When you want to speedrun the Kola Superdeep Borehole.

On topic, I'm going to revise my prediction for upcoming Starship flights, given the FWS paperwork that needs to go through, we'll probably scrape by with IFT-2 this year, while IFT-3 will follow early next year. Though provided how well IFT-2 goes, I still think they'll manage 4-5 flights next year. It would've been nice to have 3 test flights this year, but I think it'll end up being too tight. 2 is still possible imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...