Jump to content

[We need more posts! (Like seriously, a lot more)] Let's Make This the Megathread!


Misguided Kerbal

Recommended Posts

♫ Big brain man   ♫ ♫

♫ ♫♫big brain man 

♫ does whatever a big brain can 

♫ makes a thought ♫♫♫

any size 

♫♫reads a book♫ 

♫♫and eats pie♫ 

♫♫♫look out,♫♫

♫♫ here comes the big brain man♫♫♫♫

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Souptime said:

i think you just download the latest version and delete the old one

I mean for example someone makes a RO patch for something, do I need to put the stuff into a textfile and that textfile into a folder in gamedata?

20 minutes ago, Wizard Kerbal said:

How are you.

lol I read how dare you

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

warning: this video contains content that makes liberty die with thunderous applause

Just now, Souptime said:

i think you just add it to the gamedata folder, the only reason modders use folders is for tidyness and cfg mapping

I'll try it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Ben J. Kerman said:

I reached my goal!!! 5 Subscribers on my YouTube channel before the end of this month!

show me your channel and then you will have 6 :D

-----------------------------------------------------------------

today is not my birth day

dede

I'm not gonna surf (in) may

dede

anakin once said in a ytp ''you don't say!''

dede

there is a electrical thing named relay

also spätzle

Spätzle Grundteig- Rezept | GuteKueche.at

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Direct ascent of same mass requires a bigger rocket.

But at same time it allows to make the ship twice lighter (no double cabin, no double life support, no docking systems, no fuel for orbital maneuvers, no orbiter pilot, a lot of other), so in total the rocket stays more or less same.

Of course, it means that you don't have a life support redundancy like Apollo-13 used.

Edited by kerbiloid
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, kerbiloid said:

Direct ascent of same mass requires a bigger rocket.

But at same time it allows to make the ship twice lighter (no double cabin, no double life support, no docking systems, no fuel for orbital maneuvers, no orbiter pilot, a lot of other), so in total the rocket stays more or less same.

Of course, it means that you don't have a life support redundancy like Apollo-13 used.

I'm pretty sure the Apollo direct ascent lander was going to be heavier than the CM/LM combo that flew, which would have influenced LV dev even more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, KeaKaka said:

I'm pretty sure the Apollo direct ascent lander was going to be heavier than the CM/LM combo that flew, which would have influenced LV dev even more.

The last version of the Apollo direct ascent was as light as the CM/LM version, but the latter was already in production, so they rejected it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

omg

I saw someone in the comments of a yoda vs palpatine fight video

''people bad who dislike new starwars films''like if you don't like it when someone just casually makes normal star wars space warfare useless then you are not allowed to criticise him for that :huh:

also, technically I have 2 youtube channels, but one of them is to '''''cringe''''' and 1 of them is one where no stuff is on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...