Jump to content

CobaltWolf

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    7,338

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by CobaltWolf

  1. CobaltWolf
    Uhm... alright. Check page 45 of the manual linked below. The parts have been revamped so the names and appearance doesn't match, but you should get the idea. There's a special tank you put under the fuel tank which the sustainer is mounted to, and then the booster skirt mounts to that tank. https://www.docdroid.net/NFMmg2Q/bdb-manuel-eagle-edition.pdf#page=45
  2. CobaltWolf
    Clipper, you should look at Bluedog Design Bureau. We're adding the various LEM variants some time in the near future. Also, you should read Eyes Turned Skywards! They keep flying Apollos and Saturns up until the 90s / early 2000s which is what these Artemis landers are for.
  3. CobaltWolf
    Our top minds are at it as we speak. Unrelated, but a new release of @akron's Coatl Aerospace Probes Plus is out and you should all download it.
  4. CobaltWolf
    @Starlord Kerman I always use this method, which lets you use an emissive texture. However, if I remember the stock part's window emissives look pretty much exactly like that gif you posted.
  5. CobaltWolf
    Is ~400 parts big enough?
  6. CobaltWolf
    Thank you! Hmm, too bad I didn't include a coax connector!
  7. CobaltWolf
    The feature in the VAB where you can move something after placing it? It's the second of the 4 buttons at the top left of the viewer in the VAB. You can pull it up by pressing '2' on your keyboard.
  8. CobaltWolf
    I don't even think we use the same profile anymore...
  9. CobaltWolf
    This sounds so awesome, but I'd like to echo a request for mod support. I have absolutely zero idea how this works, but it seems to me it might be possible to have a general version apply automatically to any part with a Docking Node module? Transforms could also possibly be read from the part? Perhaps with provisions made to have more specific requirements (ex, some mods have docking ports that have physical alignment fins and can only be attached in 90 degree increments anyways). Also going to mention the importance of supporting KJR and possibly autostrut, if possible. Maybe temporarily disabling those features when the ports move? Sorry, I am not a coder, so these may be really obvious 'impossibles'.
  10. CobaltWolf
    Been a long time coming, looking forward to it!
  11. CobaltWolf
    Thank you for the kind words! I'll try not to let it go to my head
  12. CobaltWolf
    IMO the simple solution is just to make the science pallet the equivalent of having all the experiments separate, in terms of cost mass etc. Maybe heavier and more expensive, because it has the extra structural bits. But to me it seems like it would just be a visual choice. Some probes would look good with that integrated pallet, some would look better with separate experiments. And it is going to be a late game part, right?
  13. CobaltWolf
    The honest answer? @IronCretin put them on his Vostok Continued and I liked it a lot and it went into my toolbox as a shorthand greeble.
  14. CobaltWolf
  15. CobaltWolf
    I'll try and clarify. It is entirely a visual issue - the rocket will work fine. I will take a look at it now with fresh eyes and try to fix it. In other news, DEV STREAM STARTING NOW on Twitch. Going to be working on MOL updates, maybe canoodle with some of the one-off parts that I forgot in the last update.
  16. CobaltWolf
    Hmm, yes. I forgot that's still an issue. Y'know what, I'll log an issue on Github. See if I can't reduce the issue a bit.
  17. CobaltWolf
    It's nice to have consensus for once! Alrighty then, I'll keep going with these revamps. One thing I would like to do sooner rather than later is put the Gemini stuff (MOL, Gemini Lander, and Big G) 'to bed' so that I can move forward without feeling that I've 'forgotten it'.
  18. CobaltWolf
    Block-D is already in Tantares, and I believe @Beale is doing Briz KM and M in his next update. I personally am more interested in lander parts, since those feel more useful than upper stages, especially solid ones. Lander parts are usable by more players (whereas a lot of players probably wouldn't bother with solid upper stages) and are also a more underserved niche in parts. I'd be willing to contribute the orbital parts for Voyager '67, I already started modeling it a bit. I'd be interested in a full Viking Orbiter / Lander part set for a next release; you did a good job splitting up Surveyor.
  19. CobaltWolf
    @Rocket In My Pocket I usually just ask the CKAN developers nicely
  20. CobaltWolf
    Hmmm, sounds like a Module Manager question. Afraid I don't know more than that. Some work from this morning; one thing I'd like to get out of the next update if finish the long standing revamps that started over a year ago. The expanded Gemini and MOL parts are some of the more egregious examples remaining in the mod. Some people have told me they'd like another MOL Lab that properly fits into a 1.875m profile, anyone else like that idea?
  21. CobaltWolf
    Considering we are approaching a year since the first announcement, I'd really like to have an idea, maybe a rough %, of how far along they feel they are.
  22. CobaltWolf
    Oh man, thanks everyone!
  23. CobaltWolf
    FASA's still limping around, Bluedog is still actively updated:
  24. CobaltWolf
    VenomousRequiem is no longer around to make RP configs. We need more volunteers for cleaning up and updating our config files!
  25. CobaltWolf
    Update is out.
×
×
  • Create New...