Jump to content

theJesuit

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3,198

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by theJesuit

  1. theJesuit
    These things do sound good. It was almost as if you had coded already... but no download button you tease. I like the idea of opaque areas in the rings as light should diffuse theough them. Also that the scatter effect works well, but I'd remove completely on a scene change if it isnt attached to a command probe. Debris should also be auto deleted if they swing through a ring system. Lost in the noise perhaps. Peace.
  2. theJesuit
    I'm not sure if mass is conserved with this. An ant trying to move a 5 kilo bag of sugar would struggle on its own, and in space would likely find that momentum the issue.
  3. theJesuit
    Before I welcomed you to the Forums. This is more welcome to KSP. Bugs are much fewer now than in yesteryear. KAS might be what you are looking for. My thinking is adding much larger storage capability parts by MM patch and +PART the n stripping away whatever is in it and adding appropriate cargo storage. Then patching more items that will fit. I'm thnking of using the mk3 cargo bays as an example but remove the opening door. Then patcjing all the 2.5m parts. I think in kerbalEVA and the female equivalent that there is a mass linit that could be patched too.
  4. theJesuit
    @dew111 welcome to the Forums! Ive wondered this myself... ill have a look at this tonight or tomorrow morning. Peace.
  5. theJesuit
    Would you make an RTG style generator i.e. always on filling up the tanks, or as part of the ISRU? Peace.
  6. theJesuit
    Nice to know that EVA Transfer mod is kinda stockish.
  7. theJesuit
    What you are looking for is the Making History DLC and also the Missing History mod. That will cover most of what you are looking for in Stock Textures. Peace.
  8. theJesuit
    This looks great. Nice work.
  9. theJesuit
    @Fundati, Like @hemeac I started with using MM patches to patch into kerbalism until kerbalism went down the separate config route. This was helpful as the profile in kerbalism is not very helpful in MM patching. The kerbalism all the comsumption rates are in the profile, called default.cfg. This is in the KerbalismConfig download. The rukes define consumption rates, what kills etc. Supplies are what goes into pods and the processes are for all the funky things that you might want to do such as isru or fuel cells that are kinda independant to what the kerbals themselves do internally. Happy to answer any questions. Peace.
  10. theJesuit
    You are such amazing and beautiful people. I wasn't meaning to poke bears... stressful morning has been made so much better. Thank you all! Peace.
  11. theJesuit
    Thankfully it is , I will probably remove radiation though It is also licensed as the Unlicesne so you can do what you like with the code!
  12. theJesuit
    I do disagree. The ECLSS, is for temperature regulation, pressure is simulated and it adds to kerbal stress if it isnt there and requires nitrogen to keep cabins pressurised as it similates leaks at the same rate as the ISS per square metre of surface area. I would like the food, water, air and components to be in the new containers too but the current devs have said that is beyond their scope currently. . That would be a great point of difference. One other idea that would be awesome (if you are coding from scratch) is for stored food to have a shelf life. If you are going to have a greenhouse system, kernalism has found that the mass of the greenhouse is too great for missions under say 6 years, orbat least a long time. Delta vee wise it is cheaper to take prepackaged food. If that food, even freeze dried, expires, it forces a new way of planning long term missions. Again, kerbalism devs aren't willing to take this on. Peace.
  13. theJesuit
    Whilst I wouldn't mind having another mod to play with, canI humbly suggest you look at kerbalism? This may fulfil what you are looking to achive. Also... kerbalism 4 is under developement if you are wanting to get your teeth into something that needs some help gettinv finished. However, not many mods cover the eat breathe, drink plus waste along with pressure and temperature. So something new would be great. Peace.
  14. theJesuit
    I've been waiting for a 1.11 release to start a new career but it i don't think I can wait much longer So I may just avoid the bugged parts and start anyway. Peace.
  15. theJesuit
    With mods too I think.
  16. theJesuit
    Are you talking about the Achievements.cfg that is in the Achievements folder? As there doesn't seem to be any other cfg files in the download. I can see examples, some commented out, in the Achievements.cfg file, but even the commented out ones look to be added to the persistence file which suggests that they are hard coded by the mod. I'm looking to remove all the 145 or so ones that come with mod, so that I only have 4 rewards, i.e. enter SOI, orbit, land, plant flag. The idea is a proof for a 'flag and footprints' playthrough.
  17. theJesuit
    Hi @linuxgurugamer, finally getting round to having this for a playthrough. Is there any way to disable the built in achievements and then specify my own? Thanks for the work that you are doing. Peace.
  18. theJesuit
    I do get this sometimes. It often means i cant throttle down, but i can turn off the engine from the PAW. I put it down to a mechanical failure. But yes, an exit and return fixes the issue. Peace.
  19. theJesuit
    1. Kinda. They don't work together. Kerbalism is much harder and near impossible to make sustained bases. 2. That would be Extraplanetary Lauchpads. Or Global Construction.
  20. theJesuit
    @Fundati I'm not sure of your coding experience. I don't, but I'm handy at sorting through config files so I've made mods that way. I wonder if you have a lot of coding experience, then helping with kerbalism 4.0 development rather than starting from scratch. If you have little experience, this is a great place to learn, or if you are like me then create your own profile to suit. Some of the things you mentioned i agree with, and so created Kerbalism Simplex, less reources basically. But not having to worry about nitrogen was important to me. Peace.
  21. theJesuit
    I think thats okay. Give plenty of time to get there to science it up and stop the explosions. Not making it face Dres seems a very kerbal way of designing things. Peace.
  22. theJesuit
    I'm aware of the issue. But away currently so have t been able to update.
  23. theJesuit
    I would say yes. Aside from supporting Squad and showing TakeTwo that there is still enough interest in ongoing support to 2022-3 financial year for Squad to keep going... the 'stock' propellors and engines for planes make it worthwhile. Making History is a different pod of goo.
  24. theJesuit
    Did you get the cameras to work in a browser window?
  25. theJesuit
    Simple and effective.
×
×
  • Create New...