Ozymandias_the_Goat

its really just the same as a fancy font but hey...

Only if they are made of meatloaf. What is six times stupid?

Banned because... I refute it thus! How do I get a statue like that one?

Because you can prove the parallel postulate by bending a haggis is three. How are baby bottles made?

Financial module, to not make more modules.

If bagginsses doesn’t tell us the answer, then we eats it whole, yes preciousssss

My preference is to play sandbox with TAC and @Galileo‘s rescale for a sort of RO lite (and it’s compatible with 1.5). I usually set mission budgets, but the constraints set by the mod set, and my predisposition to build realistic spacecraft make the constraints of career mode unnecessary.

“There is something fascinating about science. One gets such wholesale returns of conjecture out of such a trifling investment of fact.” Courtesy of Mark Twain, of course.

Planet packs from earlier versions work fine with the latest version of ksp if Kopernicus is updated. So if you’re using the kopernicus for v1.6 I see no reason for rss 1.4.5 not to work.

Indeed, although I find that the reputation system is good at doing just that, highlighting reputable users that are more likely to provide helpful feedback, simply due to the fact that they have been doing that for a long time. Although, the universal reaction button is somewhat vague, I have seen other forums where you can give specialized reactions (such as laugh for humorous content, thanking for someone who helped you through a problem, etc.) yet have no designated dislike button. That is the purpose of moderators, not the forum, to determine when something crosses the line.

Banned for being in deep thought (or should I say, merely rearranging your prejudices).

Not excluding the possibility of living on Mars. Is there ever a scenario where they are?

Certainly I’m not disagreeing with the technical points. However, it is significant that fewer, larger parts will have less lag, although if your computer is good this is likely not an issue, and the making history engines do tend to be quite a bit better than the stock ones, although it does not appear as if you used them.

I am now hahaha! 4/10 that’s a lot of space you could be occupying

I couldn’t help noticing that the design above uses making history, in fact it is almost entirely made of 5m parts. It seems as though @bitzoid‘s design uses only “true” stock parts. Now, you can certainly build very big stock rockets, but the part count will be quite a bit higher that with the expansion parts. If you would like 5m parts for free, there are quite a few mods that will suit you nicely, or Tweakscale to make stock parts bigger.

It’s probably been difficult (I won’t say impossible), but certainly very difficult since the improved aerodynamics of v1.0. In fact it seems that quite a few interesting atmospheric contraptions no longer work as easily, or at all, such as ion planes.

The key word being “relatively”, I suppose

6/10 aren’t we all?

True. It certainly might be convenient, but everything that I put on cloud storage sites is primarily stuff for I would like to access from computer I don’t own, like college papers via google suite or something like that. On a side note, what becomes of the pictures that we upload to the forum via imgur? I don’t have an account, so are the pictures simply anonymously stored on their server, or are they simply deleted (from the public, at least)?

I’m not sure if incessant use of the time warp feature makes one immune to the passage of years (sigh...still a few more months to warp away before my Duna transfer window), but I surely wish you the best for another year of KSP.

Are you keeping liquid fuel in the tank for the nuclear engine? Because you don’t need to, the LV-N runs on only liquid fuel.