Jump to content
Forum will be temporarily offline today from 5 pm PST (midnight UTC) ×

Friznit

Members
  • Posts

    757
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Friznit

  1. I imagine they preferred to remove things that were proven to be redundant wherever possible to reduce cost, weight and complexity.
  2. This one? https://github.com/benjee10/Benjee10_MMSEV/pull/8 Looking at the discussion thread on that PR the patch has some resource defs missing so may not be fully functional. Is there an updated version around?
  3. It's a long standing "feature" of [x]Science that impacts any science part that has two or more runs (such as cameras, mystery goo etc) and is not specific to BDB. You have to run these experiments old skool by manually clicking on the part.
  4. Pretty much all LS mods use the same approach that RD explained in the USI thread. Check their configs and patches on GitHub for details. The hard bit is balancing the quantities in a realistic way that doesn't add too much mass and mess up launch vehicle performance from other part mods
  5. Confirmed. Also if you happen to be running BDB as well the B9 errors multiply by the hundreds. I may be wrong but I think the B9PS cfg is trying to put an undefined resource type on every tank that has a B9PS module.
  6. I'd happily add it to the wiki guide but then half the fun is figuring these things out for yourself!
  7. That's a "feature" until Skyhawk makes a generic workaround patch for unsupported mods. You can add them yourself if you copy one of the mod support configs and allocate the parts to the appropriate tech node. The configs are very intuitive and I'm sure Pull Requests would be very welcome!
  8. It's fixable with a text editor. A few parts changed names, so you need to edit the craft file and update the relevant parts to the new names. Note that's the part "name" in the config file, not the "title" that shows up in game.
  9. See bottom of this page: https://github.com/friznit/Unofficial-Tantares-Wiki/wiki/Vostok
  10. Sadly not as I didn't keep them. Besides, half the fun it trying to Lego these things from images. See if you can do better than me and post your pics!
  11. Google sheets might be an easier way to share a spreadsheet. I've just added this to my game so will have a play. It'll be easy enough to relaunch the science lab part of my mini station if needed. If I was into roleplaying I'd think of the first launch as a proof of concept. It's currently full of pilots because that's what the contract demanded.
  12. Would it be possible to provide the table of experiments in spreadsheet format please? It would be useful to filter by body allowed etc to figure out which experiment to install. Also I guess this is a general Kerbalism question, but I assume it's not possible to change the experiment installed in a lab after it's launched?
  13. Superb work! And timely as I just launched my first lab in a Kerbalism career and was wondering what to do with it.
  14. Seconding this. It would work particularly well with a BDB-specific tree, as there are many duplicate experiments and it would encourage sending more advanced probes on follow up missions. Early probes provide a partial and proportionally lower % of the science available for a given experiment (which is OK, as you don't need so much science in the early tree anyway) and you need to send a follow up with more advanced tech to capture the remaining science. Finally a use for all those magnetometers!
  15. @Grimmas the link to your fork no longer works - are you still working on it? I sense that yours is probably the most active and up-to-date fork and I'd be happy to help finishing it off for the latest Saturn revamp branch if you need a hand.
  16. You have to go beyond the radiation belts and magnetosphere to get into global space (press 1,2,3 on the numpad whilst in map view to see them - helps to zoom out a bit)
  17. KopernicusWatchdog is a new invisible celestial body from Kopernicus to try around workaround a persistent bug. It could well be causing an issue with Strategia @R-T-B ,thoughts ?
  18. Yep, the C-series table is mostly from the usual interweb source, I've not gone through the source docs to correct it all yet. I need to add all the early INT stuff, then figure out a way to simplify everything down to something accessible to a KSP player who just wants to build the bloody things!
  19. I spent my day reading source docs on the various Saturn derivative studies in the 60s and summarised them all on the wiki here https://github.com/friznit/Unofficial-BDB-Wiki/issues/60#issuecomment-945790528 I will probably simplify that a whole lot for the actual wiki build guide, given that most of them are simply different B9 Partswitches on the fuel tanks and engine plates.
  20. I like it! @Morphisor and I have a similar opinion on early career development. In a regular CTT career game you unlock the first 3 or 4 tiers so quickly that you end up skipping half the BDB rockets unless you're roleplaying (or following the History of Spaceflight contract pack), even with massively nerfed science gains, which then inevitably makes the late game a dreadful grind. I'd love to have a tech tree where the early nodes are more expensive and the BDB parts more spread out. It'd provide more mileage for the early rockets and probes.
×
×
  • Create New...