Superluminal Gremlin

Maybe. As i have said. I can't tell. Im welcome to both opinions, but both are many times better than what we had before.

Yep. Most certainly Isn't the ground flat? You might be right, but from this angle, I find it hard to tell the difference.

I mean they havnt but I was referring to people sorta/semi involved with the games production. I was a little ambiguous there. Ok. I didn’t know that most sequels are like in the same area as the originals wiki. I don’t lay many sequels so I have never really had reason to go look. So for ksp 2, it will be a community made wiki, in the same page as ksp? Got it. They really should try make it a little more aesthetically pleasing tho. But if it’s in the same place, there’s a chance people could get confused between the original and the sequel.

there are different explosions??? still though, its an absolutely massive step up. And means a mod might be able to truely do it.

That's a cool idea. That should be part a part of the game, and definitely a mod, but i was talking about more like on off-game wiki that can store much more detailed information, like the ksp-wiki. The main question is, who's making it. Us(the community) or them(The devs)?

With KSP 2 coming out very soon, many players (I assume) are going to want access to all the technical data while not on the game, or for a much more in-depth review of each and very part, planet and all the juicy detail, there's going to need to be a wiki to compile the at first, normal, then much larger amount of data which will flow in from players. The question is. Has there already been a discussion about forming and creating a site. Will this be created by the KSP 2 creators or by the community? Will there be community creators willing to use there workstations, or pay the cost of hosting the site. What is the technical side to hosting a website, all the server side problems (I have done some basic front end stuff, but not to much back-end). Could the KSP/2 community do it, or will we leave it for someone else? If there has already been a thread/discussion about this, then sorry:(

This looks volumetric.

Really? Thats interesting.

So sorta like a reverse Lapat/Laythe? Laypat? Got it Love the idea. Would actually make boat parts incredibly useful.

We can confirm that there are volumetric explosions. @PD_Dakota recently just dropped a post on the KSP Sneakpeeks thread. And let me tell you, they look gorgeous. Ohy my. They are amazing. Waited so long to see those.

Ground Scatter - Good Clouds - Yes Parts surviving the explosions. Some big balls on that rocket. Fuel tanks maybe? KSP 2 is looking so much better than one has ever (excluding mods. But no mods have made realistic explosions, i think) Love it. Next photo

Nup. System Heat is what allows it to work. Its the ore of the heat system. So you have to choose. FFT or Interstellar extended (At least i think that's your problem.) I would say FFT. Easier to learn

light grey/orange probably eventually color coding everything. maybe Interstellar ships being black. why. because yes

No way, I just said we really needed a thread for this exact purpose. Also: I think i've seen some repeated clouds. Like the old ocean texture with squares, but with clouds.

You guys are measuring in days? more like months, or entire seasons [snip]

I mean screenshots would be nice but we can go from here. 1. Try clean install. 2. Check drivers maybe?? 3. Holding left-click and moving the mouse up and down is used to navigate in the SPH, as it is more horizontal than vertical.

Actually, how this rocket crashed, to the best of my knowledge, was because 3 of the 6 gyros (I think), where inverted because they were put in the wrong way :0 Such a great meme. The poor Proton has always had reliability issues, unlike the actual proton, with a estimated lifespan of at least 10^30 years.

Dune 2 anyone?

Wasn't STS-27 the one where 800 tiles where damaged or something like that number.

Granted. Due to interesting physic, the butterfly turns into antimatter to come back to present time, and blows up with the force of the force to the A-bomb used in WW2. I wish for 1 KSP 2 planet to have some form of an ecosphere also new page

Interesting. How much more performance would one need to achieve perfect 4k per eye?

nah im going to go explore the system see whats changed and just generally revel in the nicer ground graphics compared to ksp 1.

holy moly

Yep definitely your specs I have a potato (GTX 960, 8GB Ram.) Some mods have this annoying habit called memory leaking, where over time some how they use more memory, it weird and i dont fully understand it. Anyway, an upgrade could be, well, nice. Hope this helps:)

I've read it as well, and its very insightful to the Challenger disaster because of the failure of NASA to comprehend the SRB cold sealing issue. Its interesting, because in the book, Mike was coming close to losing his job over the deal with burning the OMS engines on the ascent to "put another zero behind the already conservative figures of the safety of africans" or something close to that effect. However, Young really did care about the astronauts, and was very involved in the safety of the shuttle. As in this alternate timeline, i feel as if the challenger disaster wont happen because instead of having a bureaucrat in power, we have an astronaut. Someone who knew the risks of spaceflight. This is pretty smart way of avoiding having to (maybe) kill of 7 kerbals. Very creative.