Jump to content

[KSP 1.12.1+] Galileo's Planet Pack [v1.6.6] [23 Sept 2021]

Galileo

By Galileo
in KSP1 Mod Releases

 Share

Recommended Posts

Galileo

Galileo

Posted
  • Author
Posted
15 minutes ago, Norcalplanner said:

Just wanted to drop a note that I'm starting a Mission Report thread for my 3.2x GPP Career.  This will be the first extended thing I've documented since my Kethane-powered Jool-5 mission back in 0.24.

 

Just went and read the first chapter..  And followed

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Norcalplanner

Norcalplanner

Posted
Posted (edited)
Just now, JadeOfMaar said:

@Norcalplanner I rather like this too and will be following. :)

You mentioned Kethane. May I interest you in Karbonite? It's set up so that you can design even more wildly and do things you can't do in stock or other solar systems.

Haven't used Kethane in a very long time.  Based on the extensive discussion and documentation provided in this thread and the wiki, Karbonite is already installed. :cool:

I'll add it to the list of mods in the OP.

Edited by Norcalplanner
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JadeOfMaar

JadeOfMaar

Posted
Posted
Just now, Norcalplanner said:

Haven't used Kethane in a very long time.  Based on the extensive discussion and documentation provided in this thread and the wiki, Karbonite is already installed. :cool:

@Norcalplanner Exccccelleeeent. I'm afraid players are going to lose out on like, one whole third of the novelty of this mod. xD You shall help our evil agenda with your own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Therlun

Therlun

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, JadeOfMaar said:

@Therlun I've tested the development build of ResearchBodies for KSP 1.2, with MM 2.7.4 and 2.7.5 and saw no issue. I did realize that the stable version for KSP 1.1.3 bundles MM 2.6.x and MM itself has most likely outgrown it. Please let me know how things work out.

Still can't get it to work. http://i.imgur.com/8jnnQKK.jpg

I do use module manager 2.7.5 and the latest dev builds of Kopernicus and Reseach Bodies. Maybe it's a mod interaction with one of the various other ones I use or I'm just doing something wrong. Thanks for your time looking into it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheKurgan

TheKurgan

Posted
Posted (edited)

Having a weird... issue... First off, I have cheated... I have enabled the stock resource scanner to scan for Karborundum, and I have increased the altitude it can be scanned from to match Ore, but it doesn't work. 

It worked before I installed GPP, but now I am getting a "Too High" error when scanning for it at the same altitudes as I did before.

Any ideas? besides "Stop cheating"

Disregard above, problem solved... and yes I'm still cheating :P

Edited by TheKurgan
spelling :P
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Galileo

Galileo

Posted
  • Author
Posted
23 minutes ago, Poodmund said:

@Galileo, how would you feel about possible making Nero's base colour map to use the neroRamp texture and then use the Nero00 colour map texture as an EVE cloud layer with a -10,0,0 rotational offset to match its ring's inclination?

Just a thought.

Oh great idea

Link to comment
Share on other sites
4d4Garrison

4d4Garrison

Posted
Posted

So lately I have been playing more on my stock save of GPP.

I have been getting contracts such as "Mine ore from Ciro and deliver it to the surface of Otho." and "Mine ore from Gauss and deliver it to Hephaestus."

Is there a way to fix the bodies registry or designation where you cant get impossible contracts like this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JadeOfMaar

JadeOfMaar

Posted
Posted

@4d4Garrison Actually I had found a snippet of code and installed it to prevent Ore requests from the gas giants.......but from Ciro too? :huh: I'll recheck this code and lookup how to expand it to forbid not only mining targets but delivery targets. Meanwhile, the bodies' designations are already fixed. They're numbered from innermost planet to outermost. The contract machine must be confused that Gael's index is not 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Galileo

Galileo

Posted
  • Author
Posted
5 minutes ago, 4d4Garrison said:

So lately I have been playing more on my stock save of GPP.

I have been getting contracts such as "Mine ore from Ciro and deliver it to the surface of Otho." and "Mine ore from Gauss and deliver it to Hephaestus."

Is there a way to fix the bodies registry or designation where you cant get impossible contracts like this?

no im afraid not. Its strange that this happens though because all of the gas giants in GPP use Jool as a template and Ciro is just the Sun but renamed. This might be a stock problem

Just now, JadeOfMaar said:

@4d4Garrison Actually I had found a snippet of code and installed it to prevent Ore requests from the gas giants.......but from Ciro too? :huh: I'll recheck this code and lookup how to expand it to forbid not only mining targets but delivery targets. Meanwhile, the bodies' designations are already fixed. They're numbered from innermost planet to outermost. The contract machine must be confused that Gael's index is not 1.

im pretty sure the contract machine doesnt look at the index numbers like that but if it does we are going to be breaking a lot of saves.. which is bad news for streamers and scott manley.. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Galileo

Galileo

Posted
  • Author
Posted
17 minutes ago, JadeOfMaar said:

@4d4Garrison Actually I had found a snippet of code and installed it to prevent Ore requests from the gas giants.......but from Ciro too? :huh: I'll recheck this code and lookup how to expand it to forbid not only mining targets but delivery targets. Meanwhile, the bodies' designations are already fixed. They're numbered from innermost planet to outermost. The contract machine must be confused that Gael's index is not 1.

What doesn't make sense to me is this..  Ciro doesn't have an index number... So this seems to be a random stock problem

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JadeOfMaar

JadeOfMaar

Posted
Posted

That actually makes a lot of sense. I've already covered the giants but they were still requested. Should I expand the blacklist anyway? My next question is if the rewards for these contracts are as extreme as the contracts themselves.

Also, intensity intensifies @Galileo @Poodmund @ Nero

@MaxL_1023 Mining non-solid bodies is what Karbonite, Near Future Propulsion and KSP Interstellar Extended are for. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Galileo

Galileo

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 minutes ago, JadeOfMaar said:

That actually makes a lot of sense. I've already covered the giants but they were still requested. Should I expand the blacklist anyway? My next question is if the rewards for these contracts are as extreme as the contracts themselves.

Also, intensity intensifies @Galileo @Poodmund @ Nero

@MaxL_1023 Mining non-solid bodies is what Karbonite, Near Future Propulsion and KSP Interstellar Extended are for. :)

So are you trying to decide if you need to blacklist Ciro?  I would say yes,  and if you can figure out how to permablock the gas giants or why it's not being permablocked,  that would be awesome too.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JadeOfMaar

JadeOfMaar

Posted
Posted (edited)

@Galileo Okay I will. I already have the code to block the gas giants. At that point I suspect whether the code is in a bad place (which I highly doubt), or maybe... @4d4Garrison did you omit the GPP_Resources folder from your install? Do you have Community Resource Pack?

Edited by JadeOfMaar
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Galileo

Galileo

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, MaxL_1023 said:

Nero go home, you're drunk.

im tempted to make Nero spin that quickly ALL THE TIME. not just in time warp. like a dizzy toddler

1 hour ago, 4d4Garrison said:

So lately I have been playing more on my stock save of GPP.

I have been getting contracts such as "Mine ore from Ciro and deliver it to the surface of Otho." and "Mine ore from Gauss and deliver it to Hephaestus."

Is there a way to fix the bodies registry or designation where you cant get impossible contracts like this?

If you could send me your save file for testing, ill try to figure out why these contracts are happening. 

Edited by Galileo
Link to comment
Share on other sites
This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...