ASCIInerd73 Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 (edited) 11 hours ago, Nertea said: Works fine for me. You need to give it some time to load. How long does it take to load for you? I give it about ten minutes, then it pops up this error: If it matters, I'm using Firefox Quantum. Edited January 3, 2018 by ASCIInerd73 Nicer formatting Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nertea Posted January 3, 2018 Author Share Posted January 3, 2018 17 hours ago, ASCIInerd73 said: How long does it take to load for you? I give it about ten minutes, then it pops up this error: If it matters, I'm using Firefox Quantum. I don't use said browser... suggest you have a look on Gliffy's website to check support. Unfortunately, I don't own Gliffy ;). You may have to use a different browser or be content with the static image. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ASCIInerd73 Posted January 4, 2018 Share Posted January 4, 2018 5 hours ago, Nertea said: I don't use said browser... suggest you have a look on Gliffy's website to check support. Unfortunately, I don't own Gliffy ;). You may have to use a different browser or be content with the static image. I just looked at the support info. Apparently, they don't support firefox for large images like this one is (though it works fine for smaller images). I tried it in Microsoft Edge and it worked. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MagicFireCaster Posted February 6, 2018 Share Posted February 6, 2018 Giffy isn't working for me either tried both chrome and Firefox. To be sure, that giffy layout shows the mods that add to the specific tech trees? I want to fill some gaps on the purple ones. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nertea Posted February 6, 2018 Author Share Posted February 6, 2018 17 hours ago, MagicFireCaster said: Giffy isn't working for me either tried both chrome and Firefox. Works 100% fine for me in Chrome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pleb Posted February 6, 2018 Share Posted February 6, 2018 Definitely works in Google Chrome for me on both Android and Windows 10. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MagicFireCaster Posted February 6, 2018 Share Posted February 6, 2018 5 hours ago, Nertea said: Works 100% fine for me in Chrome. Chrome also tells me that it is trying to load unauthorized scripts, should i let them run? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nertea Posted February 7, 2018 Author Share Posted February 7, 2018 23 hours ago, MagicFireCaster said: Chrome also tells me that it is trying to load unauthorized scripts, should i let them run? I'm not a security professional and can't tell you what to do. I can tell you that I am not affiliated with Gliffy though, so I'm not sure what you'll need to do to get that working. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omnipius Posted February 10, 2018 Share Posted February 10, 2018 OK, I apologize in advance if this has been asked before or is documented somewhere, but I have failed to googlefu an answer: Is the size of the R&D tech tree space limited (appears to be roughly -3000 to 0 in the X and 0 to 2400 in the Y) or can this size be dynamically set via a cfg? I am trying to create a custom tech tree, a blend of RP-0 and CTT to effectively create an RP-0 Extended that progresses all the way to (USI) colonization, (RSSC) interstellar space, and (KSPIE) Alcubierre warp drives . Yes this game is massive. It uses over 16 GB of RAM just on load. Ironically, getting the tech tree sorted out is my final obstacle other than needing to eventually cost/balance the futuristic parts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
linuxgurugamer Posted February 18, 2018 Share Posted February 18, 2018 On 5/26/2015 at 4:08 PM, HadToBeMordin said: Near Future Technologies (Construction, Props, Solar, Spacecraft Parts) [*=left]Stockalike Station Parts Expansion [*=left]Cryogenic Engines [*=left]KSP Interstellar Extended [*=left]USI Colonization Systems (OKS/MKS) [*=left]USI Exploration Pack [*=left]USI Life Support [*=left]USI Survival Pack USI Freight Transport Technologies (CTT config file in v0.4.1 manually fixed) Are these color codings still accurate? I assume the strong green are the stock categories. Are there any guidelines for where to put parts into the CTT? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nertea Posted February 19, 2018 Author Share Posted February 19, 2018 On 2/10/2018 at 2:06 PM, Omnipius said: OK, I apologize in advance if this has been asked before or is documented somewhere, but I have failed to googlefu an answer: Is the size of the R&D tech tree space limited (appears to be roughly -3000 to 0 in the X and 0 to 2400 in the Y) or can this size be dynamically set via a cfg? I am trying to create a custom tech tree, a blend of RP-0 and CTT to effectively create an RP-0 Extended that progresses all the way to (USI) colonization, (RSSC) interstellar space, and (KSPIE) Alcubierre warp drives . Yes this game is massive. It uses over 16 GB of RAM just on load. Ironically, getting the tech tree sorted out is my final obstacle other than needing to eventually cost/balance the futuristic parts. Yeah, no easy way to change the canvas size as far as I know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JadeOfMaar Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 (edited) On 2/18/2018 at 3:26 PM, linuxgurugamer said: Are these color codings still accurate? I assume the strong green are the stock categories. Are there any guidelines for where to put parts into the CTT? No, that color table isn't accurate. It's more like this... @Nertea @Angel-125 @Stone Blue @FreeThinker Please veto this. (Disclaimer, portions of this I clearly know... portions of this are clearly assumed as I've never installed all the mods that fill these, or if I have, I never checked them in the R&D building because I mostly play sandbox. I also believe there may be new tech nodes not featured in the graphic) Stock Nodes Near Future Electric, Far Future Tech, KSP Interstellar [Nuclear and super-advanced EC sources, and engines that bend physics like Epstein and Alcubierre] USI Life Support and MKS [Greenhouses and habitation things go here] ? Specialized Science Nodes [parts ought to go here that are dedicated to autonomous, unmanned, checkpoint-like surface bases. This is the foggiest to me. Curiously, DeepFreeze appears here. I guess these checkpoint bases would have facilities only for skeleton crews] (upper gray region) ? Actuators and Orbital Nodes[parts for robotics, giant or super-giant station parts, parts that can endure extreme conditions in space, and parts/systems for spawning vessels in orbit] (lower gray region) MKS and possibly Freight Transport Tech (USI) [Parts for mass resource storage and sharing-- try to exclude propellant tanks, there are plenty nodes for those] Heat Control and KSP Interstellar [Radiators and maybe heatshields, whatever keeps you below melting point] Near Future Spacecraft (upper red-purple) [heavy lifter mods: part categories: command, utility, payload, structural-- again, there are plenty other nodes for propellant tanks and engines] ? Mechatronics and AI Nodes (lower red-purple) [supercomputer like parts, super-advanced drone cores perhaps] Near Future Propulsion (purple) [epic ion engines and ion engines that run on things other than XenonGas] Far Future Technology, KSP Interstellar [fuel tanks and big engines you really don't want to use or lose in Kerbin's atmosphere] Near Future Solar, KSP Interstellar? [super-powered solar and EC-intensive utilities] ??? [more places for airplane parts] Edited February 19, 2018 by JadeOfMaar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FreeThinker Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 (edited) 7 minutes ago, JadeOfMaar said: ? Specialized Science Nodes [parts ought to go here that are dedicated to autonomous, unmanned, checkpoint-like surface bases. This is the foggiest to me. Curiously, DeepFreeze appears here. I guess these checkpoint bases would have facilities only for skeleton crews] Actually KSPIE uses these nods for it High tech science parts and equipment and lasers for beam power transmitters 7 minutes ago, JadeOfMaar said: Near Future Propulsion (purple) [epic ion engines and ion engines that run on things other than XenonGas] KSPIE also uses these nods for it electric engines 9 minutes ago, JadeOfMaar said: ? Mechatronics and AI Nodes (lower red-purple) [supercomputer like parts, super-advanced drone cores perhaps] KSPIE also uses it for it advanced artificial intelligence cores Edited February 19, 2018 by FreeThinker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
linuxgurugamer Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 If this is meant for all modders to to use, then why does it have color coding for specific mods? I realize it's historical, but shouldn't it be updated? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JadeOfMaar Posted February 20, 2018 Share Posted February 20, 2018 6 hours ago, linuxgurugamer said: If this is meant for all modders to to use, then why does it have color coding for specific mods? I realize it's historical, but shouldn't it be updated? At the time when the graphic was made it would be so, perhaps as examples only Nertea's mods are named in the comment markers in the interactive version (which I'm surprised is functioning again), and KSPI-E with its immense scope is able to fill quite a lot of tech nodes. Also all of the specific mods represented by colors are titans (huge mods, it's a sin not to know their names lol). I agree that the chart could do with an update, if only so that the unlinked nodes aren't unlinked anymore and a comment like mine above be added to give insight into approaching groups of these nodes to know which ones fit X new mod's new parts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nertea Posted February 20, 2018 Author Share Posted February 20, 2018 8 hours ago, linuxgurugamer said: If this is meant for all modders to to use, then why does it have color coding for specific mods? I realize it's historical, but shouldn't it be updated? The colours aren't mods, they're themes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FreeThinker Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 (edited) @Nertea I would like to make proposal for change for the existing fusion tech nodes Currently the situation is the following Fusion Power and Fusion Rocketry lead to Advanced Fusion Reaction, which continues to Expotic Fusion and eventualy High Density Fusion in comparison to our nuclear fusion branches, which have seperate branches for nuclear propulsion and nuclear power, this is extremely limited. Therefore I would like to propose we split the last 3 fusion technodes into 2 separate branches, like this This will allow the nuclear power breach to continue in a straight line into the fusion power branch and allow us to put more propulsion focused part and upgrades to continue in its own branch. For the names of the 3 new technodes I propose the following: id advFusionRockets specializedFusionRockets exoticFusionRockets title Advanced Fusion Rockets Specialized Fusion Rockets Exotic Fusion Rockets cost 2250 4000 10000 Edit: I implemented the necessary changes in new new pull request Edited February 24, 2018 by FreeThinker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nertea Posted February 28, 2018 Author Share Posted February 28, 2018 I am tired of new tech nodes proliferating willy-nilly everywhere. Particularly when they don't really benefit more than than one mod. Seems like change for the sake of change and for needing more icons, really. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeltaDizzy Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 On 2/24/2018 at 2:41 AM, FreeThinker said: This will allow the nuclear power breach to continue in a straight line into the fusion power branch and allow us to put more propulsion focused part and upgrades to continue in its own branch. Advances in Nuclear Power and Nuclear Propulsion should go hand-in-hand imo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angelo Kerman Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 I'd hate to see the tree become cluttered with even more empty nodes when only one or two mods would benefit. As it is, many nodes go unused, and unless you have a mod that hides unused nodes, it gets to be a bit cumbersome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ev0 Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 2 hours ago, Angel-125 said: I'd hate to see the tree become cluttered with even more empty nodes when only one or two mods would benefit. As it is, many nodes go unused, and unless you have a mod that hides unused nodes, it gets to be a bit cumbersome. There is Hide Empty Tech Tree Nodes, but the more empty nodes there are the more "forced" people would feel to use it, instead of just the people who want to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stone Blue Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 15 hours ago, ev0 said: There is Hide Empty Tech Tree Nodes, but the more empty nodes there are the more "forced" people would feel to use it, instead of just the people who want to. Heh... yeah... Needing a mod just to "clean-up" a mod, just so *that* mod, supports a specific *other* mod... :roll_eyes: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FreeThinker Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 (edited) 19 hours ago, Nertea said: Particularly when they don't really benefit more than than one mod. Well I think you are wrong on that assessment. There are as least several mods I know of which could benefit from them among them are your upcomming Future Propulsion Mod, Angels Deep Space Exploration mod RoverDude Karbonite Plus Mod. And these are just the most popular mod, there are also several less well known mods that have high tech fusion engine and reactors that would benefit from the distinction between Fusion energy and fusion propulsion Edited February 28, 2018 by FreeThinker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angelo Kerman Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 Actually, in DSEV's case, the fusion reactors and engines are developed at the same time, so splitting them up in CTT would be inconsistent with what I have when CTT isn't installed. I like having fusion tech as a broad term because from a play perspective my tech tree isn't cluttered and I'm not wasting several hundred science points just to gain 1-2 parts. I need those science points to feed BARIS and improve quality. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theonegalen Posted March 1, 2018 Share Posted March 1, 2018 @Angel-125 but I need a sprawling tech tree to make it hard to decide where to spend my points! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.