modus

I have a bit of mixed feelings. On the one hand, I like wat ProgorMatic has done, really bringing SSPXR in line whith USI/MKS. Since MKS really is an overall gameplay mod rather than 'just' a parts mod that totally makes sense. On the other hand, there's the 'problem' (and I'm using quotes because everything is relative ofcourse) of using Progor's patch in an existing save. I've been using my main save since 1.7, dropping this patch in there really changes stuff. In that sense I will probably end up using danfarnsy's patch. So yeah, imho it all depends on when you want to implement things. In a new save where you want to use MKS/USI and have some extra cool space station parts, I'd say Progors patch is the way to go. When using it in an existing save, I'd say bringing MKS in line with SSPXR, instead of the other way around, is better.

indeed it is.

Yes. Totally the best solution for me.

I think your second question was answered in the post above yours.

can confirm this!

praise da lord for the wolf wiki, it really helped me when I started Wolfing.

Welcome to the club

Klik

I am so yeah I click.

Click.

Really.

Great stuff!

Nice click mister

And why not...one more.

Oyo click!

It does.

You need to put the folder inside extras in Gamedata.

@RoverDudein the latest prerelease (used on 1.12.2) I notice that the nodes on the 5m SAS are quite far from the top and bottom of the actual SAS, leaving quite the gap when you want to attach something to it. I don't think I saw this in the previous version, where the 5m SAS was a lot...fatter Is it supposed to be like this?

Your game will go sloooooooooow.

In the latest USI pre-release (al the USI mods in one release) there's also a new bunch of science gear. Don't really know exactly which USI mod has them

That is one impressive base, really like what you did there.

That looks like a great idea because it would mean a true rebalance while not necessarily a potential savebreaker like option 2 (if I'm understanding all this correctly, haven't had much coffee today). If it's too hard i'd go for option 3.

@RoverDudeor @DoktorKrogg I noticed in the new prerelease that the Konstruction ports and stock docking ports are once again seperate parts. Is that intentional? If I'm not mistaken they were made one in the previous prerelease (which was great). (Is there a way to undo this?)

not mentioned, yet still I click!

I bet mister LGG is going to say: no logs no support