dangerhamster Posted April 8, 2017 Share Posted April 8, 2017 (edited) The second Sentinel mission was lofted giving a steady source of income and Bruce Kerman plenty of advance warning to get a new vest on. Also stepped up tourist contracts to Mun and Minmus. All this is paying for a rejig of the MOMbase concept. With part numbers increasing to ludicrous levels the decision was made to weld the base MOM chassis and some of the modules into single components onto which the moving parts can be bolted. The existing deployed modules were terminated with extreme prejudice and the design crew motivated. Using advanced techniques such as "thinking" and "light clipping" they were able to not only reduce the part count but also compactify the concept giving a much smaller footprint. Edited April 8, 2017 by dangerhamster Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roboslacker Posted April 8, 2017 Share Posted April 8, 2017 I've been playing around with boats. I've got a good submarine now, and a large tanker ship. In other news, I'm still trying to build a spaceplane. My last one ran out of oxidizer in the upper atmosphere, but I managed to land it in the highlands. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adstri Posted April 8, 2017 Share Posted April 8, 2017 I did my closest legit flyby of Slate (OPM) Ever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GDJ Posted April 8, 2017 Share Posted April 8, 2017 (edited) The prototype Lightship Sabhee Viaktar When this shot was taken it was between Kerbol and Trappist-1 (16 trillion metres away from Kerbol). There is absolutely no useable light out here. Solar panels are not useable. Use fuel cells. Better yet, a Fusion Reactor. RTG's don't put out enough (10,000 EC's worth of batteries deplete in 5 seconds at maximum warp, RTG's are like kicking a pebble against a mountain). Edited April 8, 2017 by GDJ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CatastrophicFailure Posted April 8, 2017 Share Posted April 8, 2017 3 hours ago, eloquentJane said: It's also easier to reach a Molniya orbit from Russia than a geostationary orbit, because there's no need for an inclination change with the Molniya Thus, the "poor man's" GEO. It fills the same role, and does so better, for a much smaller delta-V budget. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
munlander1 Posted April 8, 2017 Share Posted April 8, 2017 (edited) Building a 6 module station in lko. Took me 1 or 2 hours to build it and takes 30-40 minutes to launch and dock each module. Oh, I also land my second stage too. Edited April 8, 2017 by munlander1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
septemberWaves Posted April 8, 2017 Share Posted April 8, 2017 29 minutes ago, CatastrophicFailure said: Thus, the "poor man's" GEO. It fills the same role, and does so better, for a much smaller delta-V budget. I'm not sure I agree. Though the Molniya orbit is used for communications satellites just as GEO often is, their specific goals are not identical. GEO is used most commonly for communications with near-equatorial latitudes, while Molniya and similar orbits are used for communications at higher latitudes. And also, despite the lower delta-v budget, it might be more expensive to use a Molniya orbit for continuous coverage (depending on launch method), since it takes 3 satellites in different Molniya orbits (with their ascending nodes at 120 degree angles around the equator) to obtain continuous ground coverage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoboRay Posted April 8, 2017 Share Posted April 8, 2017 (edited) I've had so little time to play KSP lately. That "Von Braun Ferry Rocket"-style test flight I launched a couple of weeks ago? I just now got around to bringing them home... My projected flight path was over Miami, but some left-bank in the upper atmosphere over the Pacific pulled it north to Cape Canaveral. Passing over Mexico. The Mississippi delta off the left wing. I dipped a little low and needed a short engine burn to get back on glideslope for the KSC runway. Tampa Bay. I've run out of monoprop due to the engine burn, but I'm low enough now to be controllable without RCS. Safely above glideslope, I drop the nose and open the speed brakes. My target approach speed is 80 m/sec crossing the runway threshold. I'm a little high and fast this time, so I'm floating nearly to midfield in the flare. But that's fine... she stops on a dime. That's the prototype test article parked in the background. I used it for atmospheric glide tests. Edited April 8, 2017 by RoboRay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikki Posted April 8, 2017 Share Posted April 8, 2017 I really don`t know... I`ve just seen "The Ultimate Challenge" again, even more reward as before... Crazy. All stock KSP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordFerret Posted April 8, 2017 Share Posted April 8, 2017 On 4/7/2017 at 9:29 AM, Boganaut said: ... using an asteroid as a heat shield while aerobraking over Eve - I call this shot "The Flaming Potato" I tried that for a reentry on Kerbin. The asteroid exploded and I lost my ship and crew along with it. On 4/7/2017 at 11:56 AM, Bornholio said: SCANSat for the win. Absolutely! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odonian Posted April 9, 2017 Share Posted April 9, 2017 Clonopsis Base fully operational, producing machinery, material kits, specialized parts and enriched nuclear fuel. A major step forward in making Kerbal-kind independent of Kerbin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triop Posted April 9, 2017 Share Posted April 9, 2017 (edited) "It's a maze, it's gonna be great" President Krump Edited April 9, 2017 by Triop Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martian Emigrant Posted April 9, 2017 Share Posted April 9, 2017 19 minutes ago, Odonian said: Hey there. Looks to me like a molecule......Any chemist here that can tell us what it is? Sugar? Glycol? Methane? Soap? ME Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bornholio Posted April 9, 2017 Share Posted April 9, 2017 (edited) Gael campaign, launched my "Albatross" LGO abort station and tested a "Seagull" docking target on it. Then sent up Tito and Jeb in a Kite Orbital, forgot to send sandwiches they got hungry. First Albatross forgot to put on Docking Port. Second with port, attached docking target Seagull launched a day later. Tito and Jeb had a good view but no supplies (USI Life Support but no supplies in the pod.) As usual the dV available was excessive. Could have not had a second stage for the mission. Edited April 9, 2017 by Bornholio Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WanderingKid Posted April 9, 2017 Share Posted April 9, 2017 I just banged my head for an hour and a half trying to lift a suicide solar station with wayyy too much mono on it from Launchpad straight to Solar with 4,700+ dV on it. I finally threw my hands up, ripped off a small tank, stuffed stuffed some fins on it (loss of about 200 dV), and put it into Solar orbit doing a normal gravity turn... on the first try. That definitively ends ANY conversation for me about 'which way is better'. Grav turn me baby, uh-huh, uh-huh! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDRocketsInc Posted April 9, 2017 Share Posted April 9, 2017 [KSP 1.2.1] DD Rockets accepted a contract to test Ion Engine on escape trajectory of Minmus. We timed the launch to enable a Kerbin gravity assist and then burn out to Dres. The ship looks a lot like NASA's Dawn Ion prototype. DD Rockets introduces "Belter 1". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaturnianBlue Posted April 9, 2017 Share Posted April 9, 2017 For my analysis of the foundations for a futuristic-setting KSP mission report, I've been testing a couple ships. The most deeply tested was a heavy (~1100 mTons) Nuclear Lightbulb spacecraft headed for Duna. A mere 120 days later, the ship arrives at Duna. Burning a bit late for the insertion burn, I barely get into orbit, though I would certainly have a bigger margin had I burned at the right time. I utilize aerobraking but I had to burn fuel prograde due the fact that I underestimated the drag (the ship wobbled violently, increasing the drag massively). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikki Posted April 9, 2017 Share Posted April 9, 2017 While waiting for 1.3, my Kerbals are testing a even more bigger Kertonov 225, all stock, not even KER. This is part of my new all stock KSP Laythe Kolonisation Kampaign, all the necessary gear is under testing at the moment... Landing fully loaded and fully fueled Kertonov 225 with thrust reversers - full success: Flight to random spots on Kerbin, testing systems: And landed at the arctic, testing the refueling rig and gather some sience. Jebediah goes cart racing: Laythe i`m coming! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CatastrophicFailure Posted April 9, 2017 Share Posted April 9, 2017 5 hours ago, Triop said: "It's a maze, it's gonna be great" President Krump I want... I want to smash a rocket into it... 5 hours ago, Bornholio said: As usual the dV available was excessive. Could have not had a second stage for the mission. Edited 5 hours ago by Bornholio Is that a 2.5m Soyuz capsule? What mod's it from? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kertech Posted April 9, 2017 Share Posted April 9, 2017 (edited) 3 hours ago, CatastrophicFailure said: I want... I want to smash a rocket into it... Is that a 2.5m Soyuz capsule? What mod's it from? It looks like the Tantares mod (by @Beale) though it's actually 1.25m. If you want a bigger capsule home grown rockets do a 1.875m Soyuz replica (with retro rockets) @Triop is that the film "the cube"? Edited April 9, 2017 by Kertech Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Human Person Posted April 9, 2017 Share Posted April 9, 2017 (edited) 10 hours ago, Martian Emigrant said: Hey there. Looks to me like a molecule......Any chemist here that can tell us what it is? Sugar? Glycol? Methane? Soap? ME Chemistry student here: A cyclic compound with 5 6-rings. It has lots of different functional groups, but the source material might have been some kind of sugar. Should be solvable in water as well as polar organic substances. Is there a biochemist here? Maybe it's some kind of hormone/drug/psychoactive substance type thing. Edited April 9, 2017 by Physics Student Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sh1pman Posted April 9, 2017 Share Posted April 9, 2017 Made a cheap Eve sea level SSTO with Karbonite and Atomic Age engines. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dobelong Posted April 9, 2017 Share Posted April 9, 2017 (edited) I already had a packer mk3 cargo aircraft.... So I glued two together and tried to make a seaplane A flipped plane and several explosions changed my mind Edited April 9, 2017 by Dobelong Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikki Posted April 9, 2017 Share Posted April 9, 2017 Couldn`t resist... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoboRay Posted April 9, 2017 Share Posted April 9, 2017 (edited) Passing Madagascar, the Darter orbiter is on its first non-test operational mission to perform a crew-exchange at Wallaby Station... Appropriately, rendezvous occurs over Australia. The next orbit again passes over Australia... Edited April 9, 2017 by RoboRay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.