Jump to content

[1.12.5] Bluedog Design Bureau - Stockalike Saturn, Apollo, and more! (v1.14.0 "металл" 30/Sep/2024)

CobaltWolf

By CobaltWolf
in KSP1 Mod Releases

 Share

Recommended Posts

dave1904

dave1904

Posted
Posted (edited)
  On 12/31/2020 at 11:30 PM, computercat04 said:

It happened to me too. It seems that the physics for that specific part is bugged.

Expand  

I looked into it and the part is Physicsless. I removed the  PhysicsSignificance = 1 line and its working. Knowing BDB there is a good reason for it but I works for me now. 

Edited by dave1904
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Minmus Taster

Minmus Taster

Posted
Posted
  On 12/31/2020 at 11:41 PM, dave1904 said:

I dont think its bugged because I tested it in 1.10 and it was working. 

Expand  

no for me it was happening in 1.10.1

When the clamps were released the engine shroud just stayed there hovering but the actual engines came with the main rocket, then the shroud started to pull us back to it like we were attached to a rubber string.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pappystein

Pappystein

Posted
Posted

Don't know if this will interest anyone but I found some drawings of the Titan SRM assembly (to titan) on the Launch pads which includes the actual hardware used to hold the SRMs in place.

https://commons.erau.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=3080&context=space-congress-proceedings

I was looking for how Titan would attach Soltan (I think it would have been a smaller version of the UA12x attachment/decoupler structure.)   Given, how in these drawings the Titan side attachment is much smaller than the SRM side attachment there might be a case for that.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
dave1904

dave1904

Posted
Posted
  On 1/1/2021 at 2:04 PM, Minmus Taster said:

no for me it was happening in 1.10.1

When the clamps were released the engine shroud just stayed there hovering but the actual engines came with the main rocket, then the shroud started to pull us back to it like we were attached to a rubber string.

Expand  

I only tested it a bit in 1.10.1 but removing PhysicsSignificance = 1 has worked for both the issues with both versions of the atlas skirt.  

I've been playing around with engine igniter and since BDB is compadible with it I was wondering how certain rocket second stages dealt with fuel settling. An example of what I mean is the Delta C stage. How did they solve it in the rockets? Pressurized tanks? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Starhelperdude

Starhelperdude

Posted
Posted
  On 1/1/2021 at 5:33 PM, si2504 said:

Anybody help as to how i resolve these issues? i have the relevant version of BDB installed on 1.8.1 and as far as i'm aware, everything is correct with B9PartSwitch version.AVE6h6J.jpg

Expand  

thos types of errors can be ignored IMO, I have them on my bdb install because of bdbnic errors related to the gemini colors but it doesn't break anything or slow the game down.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
blowfish

blowfish

Posted
Posted

Kopernicus keeps changing how solar panels are configured and it's hard to support them all at once.  What it's telling you is broken is the functionality that changes how much power solar panels output based on the subtype.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Beetlecat

Beetlecat

Posted
Posted
  On 1/1/2021 at 8:59 PM, blowfish said:

Kopernicus keeps changing how solar panels are configured and it's hard to support them all at once.  What it's telling you is broken is the functionality that changes how much power solar panels output based on the subtype.

Expand  

Even as far back as KSP1.8.1's version?
 

@Starhelperdude--double check Kopernicus version to make sure it's apt for game version.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OrbitalManeuvers

OrbitalManeuvers

Posted
Posted
  On 1/1/2021 at 5:33 PM, si2504 said:

i have the relevant version of BDB installed on 1.8.1

Expand  

Are you on the latest builds, like from github? I had similar errors on a 1.8.1 install which were fixed by updating to the latest BDB (I had an older dev build installed there). The version of B9 bundled in the github download also works on 1.8.1 for me. This install is stuck in the dark ages due to KSRSS, but all the latest BDB stuff works there for me, and the same files work through 1.10.1 as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pappystein

Pappystein

Posted
Posted

zQHbAmc.jpg

Kerbin Space Agency Flight number 2.   Mercury Red Juno IVA.   Due to serious issues with man-rating engines for first stages, The KSA had to re-use the A-7 Rocket from the Redstone in a quad package to loft this.    As the Thor tank is slightly better than the Juno, Thor tanks were substituted in for the first stage.   Since JPL had zero issues meeting the man rating standards on their 45K engine, that was used for the orbital injection stage.      The Engineers and scientists were pretty certain it might make orbit....   If the solar winds were on it's side that is.  

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
si2504

si2504

Posted
Posted
  On 1/2/2021 at 4:37 AM, OrbitalManeuvers said:

Are you on the latest builds, like from github? I had similar errors on a 1.8.1 install which were fixed by updating to the latest BDB (I had an older dev build installed there). The version of B9 bundled in the github download also works on 1.8.1 for me. This install is stuck in the dark ages due to KSRSS, but all the latest BDB stuff works there for me, and the same files work through 1.10.1 as well.

Expand  

I don't know about the latest builds but I have the one's installed for 1.8.1..... Is the latest BDB backwards compatible with 1.8.1?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OrbitalManeuvers

OrbitalManeuvers

Posted
Posted
  On 1/3/2021 at 8:52 PM, si2504 said:

is it craft files that are incompatible? because im sure that before when i had a version installed made on 1.10(identified within the config files) it said incompatible, and threw a load of errors at me.

Expand  

I'm pretty sure the craft files were built with a later version of KSP, but the wiki has all those instructions, too. If you need help with builds you can always ask here, and lots of us still have 1.8.1 installs, too (mine is for KSRSS)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
si2504

si2504

Posted
Posted
  On 1/3/2021 at 9:41 PM, OrbitalManeuvers said:

I'm pretty sure the craft files were built with a later version of KSP, but the wiki has all those instructions, too. If you need help with builds you can always ask here, and lots of us still have 1.8.1 installs, too (mine is for KSRSS)

Expand  

I use KSRSS, on a 2.5x scale. So really the parts are fine to build with, but because the craft files was built in later versions, that's why they're giving me errors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DeadJohn

DeadJohn

Posted
Posted (edited)

Problem solved by uninstalling KRnD (Kerbal Research & Development).

That mod's thread warns us that "Please note that this mod is not 100% compatible with other mods which modify parts at runtime (eg TweakScale,  InterstellarFuelSwitch, Firespitter, B9PartSwitch)".

I just noticed an issue with the monoprop capacity of the Leo-D-L8SM "Raphael" Service Module, bluedog_Gemini_LunarReconSM.cfg. KSP 1.10.1. Anyone know if this is a BDB bug, B9PS bug, or bad mod install on my part?

The module has 2 variants (via B9PS) holding either 120 or 300 monoprop. I selected the 300 in VAB but after I launch it is only filled with 120 of 300, even though VAB shows it full. HyperEdit was an easy workaround for that symptom.

The bigger problem is that at seemingly random times (probably not random, I just haven't noticed a pattern yet) during flightAny time my vessel loses focus the Raphael starts allowing only 120 maximum. HyperEdit can't correct for that. Saving the game, quitting, and then a full restart got me back to the 300 maximum monoprop version.

Logfile here, but I copied it after the restart and the module has the correct 300 maximum monoprop at the moment. https://drive.google.com/file/d/11jHH8I0WoUoP4JreCfM63vB5SXm57H4R/view?usp=sharing

New info:

  • I found a spot I can trigger the bug pressing space to stage (ejecting an LFO stage), pressing alt-] to change to the debris stage, and another alt-] to come back to my vessel. The vessel has 300 max monoprop before and 120 after doing that.
  • Changing vessels, rather than staging, seems to be what activates the problem. Every time I cycle to and from that nearby debris, with no additional staging events, the Raphael tank resets to 120 max monoprop.
  • Sending my pilot on EVA also causes the 120 max issue, because the vessel with the Raphael loses focus.
  • A mere quicksave and load gets me back to 300 maximum. It's not necessary to completely restart KSP.
Edited by DeadJohn
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pappystein

Pappystein

Posted
Posted (edited)
  On 1/3/2021 at 9:50 PM, DeadJohn said:

I just noticed an issue with the monoprop capacity of the Leo-D-L8SM "Raphael" Service Module, bluedog_Gemini_LunarReconSM.cfg. KSP 1.10.1. Anyone know if this is a BDB bug, B9PS bug, or bad mod install on my part?

The module has 2 variants (via B9PS) holding either 120 or 300 monoprop. I selected the 300 in VAB but after I launch it is only filled with 120 of 300, even though VAB shows it full. HyperEdit was an easy workaround for that symptom.

The bigger problem is that at seemingly random times (probably not random, I just haven't noticed a pattern yet) during flightAny time my vessel loses focus the Raphael starts allowing only 120 maximum. HyperEdit can't correct for that. Saving the game, quitting, and then a full restart got me back to the 300 maximum monoprop version.

Logfile here, but I copied it after the restart and the module has the correct 300 maximum monoprop at the moment. https://drive.google.com/file/d/11jHH8I0WoUoP4JreCfM63vB5SXm57H4R/view?usp=sharing

New info:

  • I found a spot I can trigger the bug pressing space to stage (ejecting an LFO stage), pressing alt-] to change to the debris stage, and another alt-] to come back to my vessel. The vessel has 300 max monoprop before and 120 after doing that.
  • Changing vessels, rather than staging, seems to be what activates the problem. Every time I cycle to and from that nearby debris, with no additional staging events, the Raphael tank resets to 120 max monoprop.
  • Sending my pilot on EVA also causes the 120 max issue, because the vessel with the Raphael loses focus.
  • A mere quicksave and load gets me back to 300 maximum. It's not necessary to completely restart KSP.
Expand  

@Lisias has a small mod made to work with Tweakscale to force memory of things that KSP "overrides" maybe you need that installed?   It sounds like exactly what the mod was developed for.

https://spacedock.info/mod/2434/KSP-Recall

But beyond that, you will need to provide logs for anyone to be able to help you.  Instructions are in my signature below!

Edited by Pappystein
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DeadJohn

DeadJohn

Posted
Posted
  On 1/4/2021 at 12:46 AM, Pappystein said:

@Lisias has a small mod made to work with Tweakscale to force memory of things that KSP "overrides" maybe you need that installed?   It sounds like exactly what the mod was developed for.

https://spacedock.info/mod/2434/KSP-Recall

But beyond that, you will need to provide logs for anyone to be able to help you.  Instructions are in my signature below!

Expand  

KSP Recall didn't seem to fix the problem. The Raphael service module in flight can hold 300 monoprop when I load my save, if I change focus by sending a passenger on EVA the tank resets to a maximum of 120 monoprop, and then I have to save/load to get back to 300.

Here's another log, just about the same as the earlier one. The vessel in flight "Leo Direct" has the problem.  https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-58TZlpPERPa_WALLiHJ0YIWJgCs_Fna/view?usp=sharing

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OrbitalManeuvers

OrbitalManeuvers

Posted
Posted
  On 1/4/2021 at 1:57 AM, DeadJohn said:

The Raphael service module in flight can hold 300 monoprop when I load my save, if I change focus by sending a passenger on EVA the tank resets to a maximum of 120 monoprop, and then I have to save/load to get back to 300.

Expand  

This doesn't happen to me in 1.10.1, as somewhat expected. I've used that part lots of times. You might have some luck if you post your mod list. There's a convenient list inside the ksp.log file if you search for "folders and files"

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DeadJohn

DeadJohn

Posted
Posted
  On 1/4/2021 at 3:27 AM, OrbitalManeuvers said:

This doesn't happen to me in 1.10.1, as somewhat expected. I've used that part lots of times. You might have some luck if you post your mod list. There's a convenient list inside the ksp.log file if you search for "folders and files"

Expand  

Thanks, knowing that it works for others is very helpful.

Here's my mod list from the player.log I posted earlier. I've been using this mod list for a while (except for KSP Recall which I just added to try fixing the issue), and haven't had issues with LFO/LH2 tank variants, but I think this is the first monoprop tank where I'm trying to select a variant that contains extra monoprop.

Mod DLLs found:

  Reveal hidden contents

Folders and files in GameData:

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...