peter_12 Posted July 21, 2023 Share Posted July 21, 2023 I just wanted to ask if Saturn V in this video is a BDB inside 【4K/60帧】雄鹰登月!阿波罗11号任务模拟【坎巴拉太空计划】_哔哩哔哩bilibili_坎巴拉太空计划 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CobaltWolf Posted July 21, 2023 Author Share Posted July 21, 2023 3 hours ago, space_otter said: Is Kerbalism support included/planned for this mod? I have a career save with kerbalism and BDB. However, the BDB contracts don't work with kerbalism - e.g., the leo docking contract specifies a 'micrometeorite scan' to be recovered, however the kerbalism science overhaul doesn't allow this data to be recovered, and the contract can't be completed. Any help would be much appreciated. 2 hours ago, septemberWaves said: You probably need to ask the Kerbalism team. They know how to write compatibility better than the BDB team are likely to. I might consider writing a proper Kerbalism patch at some point, but there's no guarantee and I currently have other projects. It's a complicated mod to provide correct compatibility for. For right now, if you want to use BDB parts and have proper support for Kerbalism and you don't want to write your own patch, I can only recommend RP-1 - though that lacks most of BDB besides the crew capsules and a few other parts (and I believe some engine models in ROEngines). BDB + Kerbalism has always been handled by the Kerbalism team. But I don't think that would fix the contracts anyways. 1 hour ago, peter_12 said: I just wanted to ask if Saturn V in this video is a BDB inside 【4K/60帧】雄鹰登月!阿波罗11号任务模拟【坎巴拉太空计划】_哔哩哔哩bilibili_坎巴拉太空计划 No, I think that is the DECQ Saturn. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zarbon44 Posted July 21, 2023 Share Posted July 21, 2023 A little crossover episode. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MashAndBangers Posted July 21, 2023 Share Posted July 21, 2023 4 hours ago, Zarbon44 said: A little crossover episode. This is cursed. AND I LOVE IT! (also saw your pics on Imgur, great stuff!) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Entr8899 Posted July 21, 2023 Share Posted July 21, 2023 7 hours ago, Zarbon44 said: A little crossover episode. What's that rectangular gold flap on the top of the lander? Looks as though it is the cover for some sort of experiment? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OrbitalManeuvers Posted July 22, 2023 Share Posted July 22, 2023 3 hours ago, Entr8899 said: What's that rectangular gold flap on the top of the lander? Looks as though it is the cover for some sort of experiment? That's the LRV's Front Palette Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woodb3kmaster Posted July 22, 2023 Share Posted July 22, 2023 I just reported this on the GitHub, but just to make sure others are aware: if you have Better Early Tree installed alongside BDB, some parts can't be unlocked, because they're assigned to a tech node that BET renames. This mostly affects Gemini/Leo parts, but for all I know, there may be others affected. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brainpop14 Posted July 23, 2023 Share Posted July 23, 2023 On 7/20/2023 at 9:23 AM, CobaltWolf said: You want to use the RO parts mods, ROEngines, ROCapsules, etc. They use their own version of the BDB models. I wanna use! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OrbitalManeuvers Posted July 23, 2023 Share Posted July 23, 2023 The prettiest rocket, I decided. Spoiler Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoldForest Posted July 24, 2023 Share Posted July 24, 2023 15 hours ago, Brainpop14 said: I wanna use! Patience. We all wanna use, but only when it's ready. 12 hours ago, OrbitalManeuvers said: The prettiest rocket, I decided. Hide contents Can't go wrong with Delta IV. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zorg Posted July 24, 2023 Share Posted July 24, 2023 Some work on the booster skirt and core tank variations Atlas ABC, Early Atlas D, Later Atlas D and subsequent derivatives, Atlas E/F Gonna need at least another core tank variant for Atlas III and probably Atlas II and Atlas I (maybe). Atlas D close up Atlas E/F close up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveyJ576 Posted July 24, 2023 Share Posted July 24, 2023 12 minutes ago, Zorg said: Some work on the booster skirt and core tank variations Atlas ABC, Early Atlas D, Later Atlas D and subsequent derivatives, Atlas E/F Gonna need at least another core tank variant for Atlas III and probably Atlas II and Atlas I (maybe). Atlas D close up Atlas E/F close up Excellent! Glad to see the symmetrical avionics side pods for the A/B/C versions. Is the early Atlas A long skirt variant part of the plan? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zorg Posted July 24, 2023 Share Posted July 24, 2023 10 minutes ago, DaveyJ576 said: Excellent! Glad to see the symmetrical avionics side pods for the A/B/C versions. Is the early Atlas A long skirt variant part of the plan? Uh maybe but probably not. Completely unique UVs for the core tanks is going to hit texture space quite hard as it is and the early A skirt as opposed to the later one shared with B and C is very niche. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoldForest Posted July 24, 2023 Share Posted July 24, 2023 @Zorg Is the OV side mounted payload bay still planned or was that scrapped? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
svcino Posted July 24, 2023 Share Posted July 24, 2023 @Zorg Atlas III have single avionic pod at right side of balloon tank and Large oxidizer pipe From atlas CCB https://imgur.com/a/w2bXRpX Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zorg Posted July 24, 2023 Share Posted July 24, 2023 10 minutes ago, svcino said: @Zorg Atlas III have single avionic pod at right side of balloon tank and Large oxidizer pipe From atlas CCB https://imgur.com/a/w2bXRpX yeah I know thanks. That's why I said the Atlas III variant still needs to be done. 37 minutes ago, GoldForest said: @Zorg Is the OV side mounted payload bay still planned or was that scrapped? I havent scrapped anything. Are you talking about the scientific passenger pods launched on the side of the base tank? OR the weird flat fairing for OV-1 with side opening doors? (both are planned in any case) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveyJ576 Posted July 24, 2023 Share Posted July 24, 2023 3 hours ago, Zorg said: Uh maybe but probably not. Completely unique UVs for the core tanks is going to hit texture space quite hard as it is and the early A skirt as opposed to the later one shared with B and C is very niche. Thank you for the consideration. No problem. Very happy with your other planned upgrades. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blufor878 Posted July 24, 2023 Share Posted July 24, 2023 8 hours ago, Zorg said: Some work on the booster skirt and core tank variations Atlas ABC, Early Atlas D, Later Atlas D and subsequent derivatives, Atlas E/F Gonna need at least another core tank variant for Atlas III and probably Atlas II and Atlas I (maybe). Atlas D close up Atlas E/F close up Best birthday gift ever! well, technically mine was yesterday, but I had to work. So perfect timing! (Is it odd for me to get this excited for booster skirt/core tank variants?) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toaster355 Posted July 24, 2023 Share Posted July 24, 2023 I keep getting a fatal error upon startup of modulemanager saying something along the lines of "Modular Manager threw an exception. Please check KSP's log for more details". I asked about this quite a long time ago; I think it was @lemon cupthat gave me a file titled something like "BDB_SCFIX" but I no longer have it. Can I please get another download link for it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoldForest Posted July 25, 2023 Share Posted July 25, 2023 15 hours ago, Zorg said: yeah I know thanks. That's why I said the Atlas III variant still needs to be done. I havent scrapped anything. Are you talking about the scientific passenger pods launched on the side of the base tank? OR the weird flat fairing for OV-1 with side opening doors? (both are planned in any case) I was mostly talking about the side mounted pod for OV-1, yeah, but I'm glad to hear the actual payload fairing will be coming too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zorg Posted July 25, 2023 Share Posted July 25, 2023 Some more core tank stuff Atlas II-AS: There are some variations on the length of the lox pipe that fall between Atlas II and Atlas D but not sure thats feasible texture space wise unless I can come up with some clever UV trick or something. Atlas III: These are all WIP of course and more details and tweaks to come. But as things stand these two plus the four I posted earlier will make up the core tank mesh variations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Socowez Posted July 26, 2023 Share Posted July 26, 2023 Mercury-Titan! (has this been done before?) Perhaps in an alternate timeline where Titan was developed before Atlas. I don't know, that's my slap-on explanation. I'm not sure if there was a better fuel tank for the transition between 1.25m and 1.5m, but at my current spot in the tech tree, the Thor tank was the best I had. Apologies for the bland camera work, it is difficult to get a good angle when focusing on controlling the rocket. Here's some more screenshots from a separate flight with Algol SRBs. I originally had the problem of lacking DeltaV, before I realized the fuel switch on aforementioned Thor tank was fueled with Kerolox instead of Hypergolic fuel which the LR91 engine uses. 5 attempts at an orbit contract and roughly 80k funds were dumped into a rocket carrying 2.3 tons of dead weight in place of much-needed fuel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shakuvendell Posted July 26, 2023 Share Posted July 26, 2023 2 hours ago, Socowez said: Mercury-Titan! (has this been done before?) Perhaps in an alternate timeline where Titan was developed before Atlas. I don't know, that's my slap-on explanation. I'm not sure if there was a better fuel tank for the transition between 1.25m and 1.5m, but at my current spot in the tech tree, the Thor tank was the best I had. Apologies for the bland camera work, it is difficult to get a good angle when focusing on controlling the rocket. Here's some more screenshots from a separate flight with Algol SRBs. I originally had the problem of lacking DeltaV, before I realized the fuel switch on aforementioned Thor tank was fueled with Kerolox instead of Hypergolic fuel which the LR91 engine uses. 5 attempts at an orbit contract and roughly 80k funds were dumped into a rocket carrying 2.3 tons of dead weight in place of much-needed fuel. Yeah, but mine didn't have boosters. Pure Titan 1. Boosters look pretty dang cool, though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pappystein Posted July 26, 2023 Share Posted July 26, 2023 21 hours ago, Socowez said: Mercury-Titan! (has this been done before?) Perhaps in an alternate timeline where Titan was developed before Atlas. I don't know, that's my slap-on explanation. I'm not sure if there was a better fuel tank for the transition between 1.25m and 1.5m, but at my current spot in the tech tree, the Thor tank was the best I had. Apologies for the bland camera work, it is difficult to get a good angle when focusing on controlling the rocket. Here's some more screenshots from a separate flight with Algol SRBs. I originally had the problem of lacking DeltaV, before I realized the fuel switch on aforementioned Thor tank was fueled with Kerolox instead of Hypergolic fuel which the LR91 engine uses. 5 attempts at an orbit contract and roughly 80k funds were dumped into a rocket carrying 2.3 tons of dead weight in place of much-needed fuel. Titan I and Atlas A were congruent developments. Doing this was a "Belt and Braces" approach to improve the chances ONE of the two rockets could lift the early AVCO "shapes." Atlas had a higher payload fraction and was simpler, which is why it was the first orbital launch and not Titan I (Titan I is much heavier so it has a lower fuel fraction which means it doesn't lift as much as far as Atlas.) Also, Titan I engines are Kerolox! You used Titan II/III/IV engines if you had the thor tank's fuel switch wrong Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guest10985 Posted July 26, 2023 Share Posted July 26, 2023 On 7/25/2023 at 8:41 AM, Zorg said: Some more core tank stuff Atlas II-AS: There are some variations on the length of the lox pipe that fall between Atlas II and Atlas D but not sure thats feasible texture space wise unless I can come up with some clever UV trick or something. Atlas III: These are all WIP of course and more details and tweaks to come. But as things stand these two plus the four I posted earlier will make up the core tank mesh variations. Is Atlas V going to get a revamp as well?(i.e. new textures for CCB and SRBs, and possibly centaur forward load reactor if you have time) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.