JadeOfMaar Posted July 3, 2019 Share Posted July 3, 2019 @vossiewulf There is a known problem that the location of the KSC Monolith is hardcoded to the stock location so when the KSC moves, its monolith becomes worthless. (GPP problems lol.) Cancel that contract and move on, my dude. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jognt Posted July 3, 2019 Share Posted July 3, 2019 @JadeOfMaar any plans to bundle a JadeOfMaar approved KS3P config? I love the added bit of bloom/AO but for some reason my coding feel does not translate to visual design! (And if that sunflare is anything to go by; your visual design feel is rock solid) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JadeOfMaar Posted July 3, 2019 Share Posted July 3, 2019 @Jognt There is no such plan, however, this here is quite popular. Try it out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snkiz Posted July 3, 2019 Share Posted July 3, 2019 10 hours ago, vossiewulf said: I was trying to do the anomaly contracts, but it won't acknowledge my presence at the obelisk at KSC. It's floating for some reason, so I went to some lengths to put myself in a position that the game should recognize as collocated with the obelisk, but no go. Are anomalies broken in JNSQ? It's not a bug, its a challenge! lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vossiewulf Posted July 4, 2019 Share Posted July 4, 2019 14 hours ago, Jognt said: The obelisk at KSC hasn't given me any message since... a long time. I can confirm other obelisks working as intended so whatever is up with that KSC one, it's not due to JNSQ. 11 hours ago, JadeOfMaar said: @vossiewulf There is a known problem that the location of the KSC Monolith is hardcoded to the stock location so when the KSC moves, its monolith becomes worthless. (GPP problems lol.) Cancel that contract and move on, my dude. 7 hours ago, snkiz said: It's not a bug, its a challenge! lol Thanks guys. And yes, it was entertaining to make that rover, it actually drove (on flat ground) very well. It once again made me start thinking about giant roving Mun bases Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Galileo Posted July 4, 2019 Author Share Posted July 4, 2019 21 hours ago, vossiewulf said: I was trying to do the anomaly contracts, but it won't acknowledge my presence at the obelisk at KSC. It's floating for some reason, so I went to some lengths to put myself in a position that the game should recognize as collocated with the obelisk, but no go. Are anomalies broken in JNSQ? Do you have the latest JNSQ? The monolith does not float in the latest versions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jefferyharrell Posted July 4, 2019 Share Posted July 4, 2019 1 hour ago, Galileo said: Do you have the latest JNSQ? The monolith does not float in the latest versions. I thought it was a function of your terrain detail setting. Am I mistaken? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vossiewulf Posted July 4, 2019 Share Posted July 4, 2019 1 hour ago, Galileo said: Do you have the latest JNSQ? The monolith does not float in the latest versions. I have JNSQ 0.7.0.exe. I just downloaded it maybe ten days ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesse-Lacey Posted July 4, 2019 Share Posted July 4, 2019 So I noticed an update to KS3P today and was wondering if it is likely to conflict or cause any issues with JNSQ. The pack looks beautiful as is, but post processing tends to be nice for screenshots. Any thoughts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4x4cheesecake Posted July 5, 2019 Share Posted July 5, 2019 43 minutes ago, Jesse-Lacey said: So I noticed an update to KS3P today and was wondering if it is likely to conflict or cause any issues with JNSQ. The pack looks beautiful as is, but post processing tends to be nice for screenshots. Any thoughts? I don't see any reason why KS3P should conflict with JNSQ. EVE (+any clouds) and scatterer already worked perfectly fine with KS3P and the update doesn't change the way KS3P works. It "just" adds an UI and dx11 support (for KS3P shaders, not the whole game). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesse-Lacey Posted July 5, 2019 Share Posted July 5, 2019 5 minutes ago, 4x4cheesecake said: I don't see any reason why KS3P should conflict with JNSQ. EVE (+any clouds) and scatterer already worked perfectly fine with KS3P and the update doesn't change the way KS3P works. It "just" adds an UI and dx11 support (for KS3P shaders, not the whole game). That's what I figured but I wanted to ask just in case. Thanks a bunch! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NapalmPK Posted July 6, 2019 Share Posted July 6, 2019 does this not work with 1.7.2? Fresh install with just kopernicus and nothing changed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JadeOfMaar Posted July 6, 2019 Share Posted July 6, 2019 @NapalmPK Kopernicus is not available for 1.7.2. So no planet mods will work. Kopernicus is hardcoded to only work with the exact KSP version that's in the Kopernicus version numbers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 6, 2019 Share Posted July 6, 2019 Unless you know how to compile from source, that is. It's pretty easy to do if you've done any programming whatsoever. JNSQ itself doesn't really have anything to prevent it from running on 1.7.2, and Kopernicus (well, the GitHub version, at least) also works, once you remove the version lock. In fact, I'm running it that way right now, and it's pretty awesome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OhioBob Posted July 6, 2019 Share Posted July 6, 2019 Please don't discuss removing the Kopernicus version lock in the JNSQ thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 6, 2019 Share Posted July 6, 2019 (edited) Who says anything about discussion? I made a purely factual statement, there's nothing to discuss here. For KSP Store users who have no access to 1.7.1 (say, because they missed the point at which it was available), this is a valuable bit of info, and probably the only way to play JNSQ with BG. Edited July 6, 2019 by Guest Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jefferyharrell Posted July 6, 2019 Share Posted July 6, 2019 @Dragon01 There was a how-to posted a page or two back about downloading 1.7.1 from the Squad web site. I think Bob's point (not that I'm speaking for him) is that they really don't want to have to deal with "I compiled my own Kopernicus and now your mod ate my dog" stuff. JNSQ is meant to work on the official build of Kopernicus for which it's been configured. Anything else is at-your-own-risk, don't-clutter-up-the-thread-asking-for-support stuff. That's just my own interpretation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snark Posted July 7, 2019 Share Posted July 7, 2019 Hi folks, Just a gentle reminder to keep it on topic, please. This thread is for discussing the JNSQ mod, and the last few posts are starting to derail the conversation into an argument about Kopernicus. Keep the topic on this mod, please, and not try to fight some other mod's battle here. If anyone wants to discuss their thoughts about Kopernicus, this thread is not the place for that, take it elsewhere, please. Thank you for your understanding. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
run1235 Posted July 7, 2019 Share Posted July 7, 2019 (edited) i have reasearch bodies installed along with jnsq and the difficulty options for medium shows (sun, kerbin, mun, minmus, moho) and then when i get into game, i do indeed have sun, mun, minmus, but i have jool instead of moho. Edited July 7, 2019 by run1235 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pleb Posted July 7, 2019 Share Posted July 7, 2019 3 hours ago, run1235 said: i have reasearch bodies installed along with jnsq and the difficulty options for medium shows (sun, kerbin, mun, minmus, moho) and then when i get into game, i do indeed have sun, mun, minmus, but i have jool instead of moho. Well looking in the ResearchBodies.cfg file inthe mod, these are the settings relating to Research Bodies: IGNORELEVELS { // body = easy normal medium hard Sun = true true true true Moho = false false false false Eve = false false false false Gilly = false false false false Kerbin = true true true true Mun = true true true true Minmus = true true true true Duna = false false false false Ike = false false false false Edna = false false false false Dak = false false false false Dres = false false false false Jool = true true true false Laythe = false false false false Vall = false false false false Tylo = false false false false Bop = true false false false Pol = true false false false Lindor = true false false false Krel = true false false false Aden = false false false false Riga = false false false false Talos = false false false false Hamek = false false false false Eeloo = true false false false Celes = false false false false Tam = false false false false Nara = false false false false Amos = false false false false Enon = false false false false Prax = false false false false } I play with Research Bodies and can confirm that this is how I see the planet initially depending on the mod's difficulty setting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sturmhauke Posted July 7, 2019 Share Posted July 7, 2019 Personally, I don't think it makes sense to have any of the major planets or even the larger moons hidden on easy mode. In our solar system, all 9 classical planets (including Pluto), most of the larger moons, and several asteroids and comets were all discovered before the age of rocketry. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_discovery_of_Solar_System_planets_and_their_moons https://www.space.com/51-asteroids-formation-discovery-and-exploration.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brigadier Posted July 7, 2019 Share Posted July 7, 2019 1 hour ago, sturmhauke said: Personally, I don't think it makes sense to have any of the major planets or even the larger moons hidden on easy mode. In our solar system, all 9 classical planets (including Pluto), most of the larger moons, and several asteroids and comets were all discovered before the age of rocketry. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_discovery_of_Solar_System_planets_and_their_moons https://www.space.com/51-asteroids-formation-discovery-and-exploration.html Who says the discoveries are over? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superfluous J Posted July 7, 2019 Share Posted July 7, 2019 1 hour ago, Brigadier said: Who says the discoveries are over? It's one thing to say we might discover another planet. It's another to hide the existence of the game's equivalent of Mars from its inhabitants. However in the gameplay vs realism continuum, this looks like some fun gameplay. And you can't reasonably expect someone who installed ResearchBodies to want all the planets to be already discovered by default. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norcalplanner Posted July 7, 2019 Share Posted July 7, 2019 I thought it would be fun, but it just turned out to be annoying for me. I don't think I'll use Research Bodies again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pleb Posted July 8, 2019 Share Posted July 8, 2019 15 hours ago, Norcalplanner said: I thought it would be fun, but it just turned out to be annoying for me. I don't think I'll use Research Bodies again. I know what you mean, though I've only ever used it with JNSQ so I don't know how to compare it to a 'normal' game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.